Assessing the ecosystem services and disservices provided by migratory wildlife across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

被引:2
|
作者
Maher, Samantha M. L. [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Barker, Kristin J. [1 ]
Kroetz, Kailin [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Butsic, Van [1 ]
Leonard, Bryan [2 ,3 ]
Middleton, Arthur D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Property & Environm Resource Ctr, Bozeman, MT USA
[4] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC USA
[5] 130 Hilgard Way, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Disservices; Migration; Wildlife; Private lands; SOIL-NITROGEN; ELK; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; PATTERNS; VALUES; BRUCELLOSIS; FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110090
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Highly mobile and migratory wildlife are ecologically, culturally, and economically important because they provide ecosystem services across heterogenous landscapes. Migratory ungulates (hoofed mammals) are particularly influential because of their large body size, seasonal movement across vast distances, and ties to human society. Ungulate migrations are widely declining in the face of habitat alteration, and initiatives across the globe seek to conserve them. However, migratory herds can generate significant costs or disservices for landowners and communities, complicating management and conservation. We demonstrate how a compre-hensive assessment of the ecosystem services and disservices (ESDs) provided by mobile wildlife can enable conservation policy that facilitates co-existence across multi-use landscapes. Our mixed-methods approach ap-plies the widely recognized Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ESD categories as a framework to combine formal scientific knowledge spanning multiple disciplines with experiential knowledge gathered from local stakeholders through interviews. We apply this methodology in the context of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), which harbors long-distance migrations of six ungulate species that move between public protected areas and private working lands. We discuss how stakeholder knowledge corroborates or contradicts scientific literature and characterize stakeholder groups and their per-spectives. We suggest that formal assessments of ESDs within their ecological and socioeconomic contexts could mobilize resources for conservation, increase returns on conservation spending, and support conflict resolution amongst groups seeking to manage wildlife for different objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conserving transboundary wildlife migrations: recent insights from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Middleton, Arthur D.
    Sawyer, Hall
    Merkle, Jerod A.
    Kauffman, Matthew J.
    Cole, Eric K.
    Dewey, Sarah R.
    Gude, Justin A.
    Gustine, David D.
    McWhirter, Douglas E.
    Proffitt, Kelly M.
    White, P. J.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 18 (02) : 83 - 91
  • [2] Diverse migratory portfolios drive inter-annual switching behavior of elk across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Zuckerman, Gabriel R.
    Barker, Kristin J.
    Gigliotti, Laura C.
    Cole, Eric K.
    Gude, Justin A.
    Hurley, Mark A.
    Kauffman, Matthew J.
    Lutz, Daryl
    MacNulty, Daniel R.
    Maichak, Eric J.
    McWhirter, Doug
    Mong, Tony W.
    Proffitt, Kelly
    Scurlock, Brandon M.
    Stahler, Daniel R.
    Wise, Ben
    Middleton, Arthur D.
    ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05):
  • [3] Governing trade-offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human-wildlife coexistence
    Ceausu, Silvia
    Graves, Rose A.
    Killion, Alexander K.
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    Carter, Neil H.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (03) : 543 - 553
  • [4] Looking into Pandora's Box: Ecosystem disservices assessment and correlations with ecosystem services
    Campagne, Carole Sylvie
    Roche, Philip K.
    Salles, Jean-Michel
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 30 : 126 - 136
  • [5] Wildlife migrations highlight importance of both private lands and protected areas in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Gigliotti, Laura C.
    Xu, Wenjing
    Zuckerman, Gabriel R.
    Atwood, M. Paul
    Cole, Eric K.
    Courtemanch, Alyson
    Dewey, Sarah
    Gude, Justin A.
    Hnilicka, Patrick
    Hurley, Mark
    Kauffman, Matthew
    Kroetz, Kailin
    Lawson, Arthur
    Leonard, Bryan
    MacNulty, Daniel
    Maichak, Eric
    McWhirter, Douglas
    Mong, Tony W.
    Proffitt, Kelly
    Scurlock, Brandon
    Stahler, Daniel
    Middleton, Arthur D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 275
  • [6] Urban constructed wetlands: Assessing ecosystem services and disservices for safe, resilient, and sustainable cities
    Shah, Aamir Mehmood
    Liu, Gengyuan
    Chen, Yu
    Yang, Qing
    Yan, Ningyu
    Agostinho, Feni
    Almeida, Cecilia M. V. B.
    Giannetti, Biagio F.
    FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (04) : 582 - 596
  • [7] Hydro-morphological characteristics provide insights into coral reef ecosystem services and disservices
    Alemu, Jahson Berhane, I
    Ishmael-Lalla, Medina
    Mannette, Ryan P.
    Williams, Giles J.
    Agard, John
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 49
  • [8] Editorial: Ecosystem Services and Disservices Provided by Plant-Feeding Predatory Arthropods
    Pappas, Maria L.
    Broufas, George D.
    Pozzebon, Alberto
    Duso, Carlo
    Waeckers, Felix
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 7
  • [9] Integrating ecosystem services and disservices: insights from plant invasions
    Vaz, Ana S.
    Kueffer, Christoph
    Kull, Christian A.
    Richardson, David M.
    Vicente, Joana R.
    Kuehn, Ingolf
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Hauck, Jennifer
    Bonn, Aletta
    Honrado, Joao P.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 23 : 94 - 107
  • [10] Conceptual diversity and application of ecosystem services and disservices: A systematic review
    Napoles-Vertiz, Sonia
    Caro-Borrero, Angela
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 67