Control of bottom-up attention in scene cognition contributes to visual working memory performance

被引:0
|
作者
Tanabe-Ishibashi, Azumi [1 ,2 ]
Ishibashi, Ryo [3 ]
Hatori, Yasuhiro [4 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Inst Dev Aging & Canc, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
[3] Natl Inst Informat & Commun Technol, Ctr Informat & Neural Networks, Osaka, Japan
[4] Tohoku Univ, Res Inst Elect Commun, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
关键词
Visual working memory; Scene perception; Eye movements and visual; Attention; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; CAPACITY; SALIENCE; OVERT; ALLOCATION; COMPONENTS; CAPTURE; SEARCH; MODELS; SHIFTS;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-023-02740-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several studies have investigated the relationship between working memory and attention. However, most of the relevant studies so far investigated top-down attention; only a few have examined possible interactions between bottom-up attention and visual working memory. In the present study, we focused on the visual saliency of different parts of pictures as an index of the degree to which one's bottom-up attention can be drawn towards each of them. We administered the Picture Span Test (PST) to investigate whether salient parts of pictures can influence the performance of visual working memory. The task required participants to judge the semantic congruency of objects in pictures and remember specific parts of pictures. In Experiment 1, we calculated a saliency map for the PST stimuli and found that salient but task-irrelevant parts of pictures could evoke intrusion errors. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that longer gazing time at target areas results in a higher probability of making correct recognition. In addition, frequent gaze fixation and high normalized scan-path saliency values in task-irrelevant areas were associated with intrusion errors. These results suggest that visual information processed by bottom-up attention may affect working memory.
引用
收藏
页码:1425 / 1436
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Effect of Bottom-Up Attention in the Frequency of Microsaccade
    Noguchi, Shogo
    Toriyama, Chinatsu
    Yoshida, Hisashi
    Kohama, Takeshi
    I-PERCEPTION, 2019, 10 : 142 - 142
  • [32] Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing
    Cronin, Deborah A.
    Peacock, Candace E.
    Henderson, John M.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (06) : 2814 - 2820
  • [33] Revisiting the role of visual working memory in attentional control settings
    Plater, Lindsay
    Dube, Blaire
    Giammarco, Maria
    Donaldson, Kirsten
    Miller, Krista
    Al-Aidroos, Naseem
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2022, 30 (05) : 318 - 338
  • [34] Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans
    Li, Ling
    Gratton, Caterina
    Yao, Dezhong
    Knight, Robert T.
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1344 : 173 - 184
  • [35] The effects of sequential attention shifts within visual working memory
    Li, Qi
    Saiki, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [36] Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance
    Foulsham, Tom
    Alan, Rana
    Kingstone, Alan
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (07) : 2008 - 2025
  • [37] Attention is required for maintenance of feature binding in visual working memory
    Zokaei, Nahid
    Heider, Maike
    Husain, Masud
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (06) : 1191 - 1213
  • [38] Modeling Bottom-Up Visual Attention Using Dihedral Group D4
    Sharma, Puneet
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2016, 8 (08):
  • [39] The state of memory-matched distractor in working memory influence the visual attention
    Long, Quanshan
    Luo, Ting
    Zhang, Sheng
    Jiang, Yuanling
    Hu, Na
    Gu, Yan
    Xu, Peng
    Chen, Antao
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [40] Manipulations of attention dissociate fragile visual short-term memory from visual working memory
    Vandenbroucke, Annelinde R. E.
    Sligte, Ilja G.
    Lamme, Victor A. F.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (06) : 1559 - 1568