Incremental Peritoneal Dialysis-Definition, Prescription, and Clinical Outcomes

被引:4
作者
Fernandes, Adriana [1 ,3 ]
Matias, Patricia [2 ]
Branco, Patricia [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Beatriz Angelo, Nephrol Dept, Loures, Portugal
[2] Hosp Santa Cruz, Nephrol Dept, Carnaxide, Portugal
[3] Hosp Beatriz Angelo, Nephrol Dept, Ave Carlos Teixeira 3, P-2674514 Loures, Portugal
来源
KIDNEY360 | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
dialysis; incremental dialysis; incremental peritoneal dialysis; personalized medicine; residual kidney function; INTACT NEPHRON HYPOTHESIS; RESIDUAL RENAL-FUNCTION;
D O I
10.34067/KID.0006902022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Incremental peritoneal dialysis (IPD) is a strategy of RRT that is based on the prescription of a lower dose rather than the standard full dose of peritoneal dialysis (PD). The clearance goals are achieved through the combination of residual kidney function (RKF) and peritoneal clearance. The dialysis prescription should be increased as the RKF declines. IPD has been associated with clinical, economic, and environmental advantages. We emphasize possible better quality of life, fewer mechanical symptoms, lower costs, slight adverse metabolic effects, and less plastic waste and water consumption. The potential benefits for RKF preservation and the lower risk of peritonitis have also been discussed. There are some concerns regarding this strategy, such as inadequate clearance of uremic toxins and/or severe electrolyte disturbances due to undetected loss of RKF, lower clearance of medium-sized molecules (such as beta-2-microglobulin) which mostly depends on the total PD dwell time, and patients' reluctance to dose adjustments. Current clinical evidence is based on moderate-quality to low-quality studies and suggests that the outcomes of IPD will be at least identical to those of full dose. This review aims to define IDP, discuss strategies for prescription, and review its advantages and disadvantages according to the current evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 277
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] SINGLE DAILY ICODEXTRIN EXCHANGE AS INITIAL AND SOLITARY THERAPY
    Agar, Baris U.
    Sloand, James A.
    [J]. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 38 (02): : 119 - 124
  • [2] Ankawi Ghada A, 2016, Can J Kidney Health Dis, V3, p2054358116679131, DOI 10.1177/2054358116679131
  • [3] Incremental peritoneal dialysis: New ideas about an old approach
    Auguste, Bourne L.
    Bargman, Joanne M.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 2018, 31 (05) : 445 - 448
  • [4] Peritoneal Membrane Preservation
    Auxiliadora Bajo, M.
    del Peso, Gloria
    Teitelbaum, Isaac
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) : 77 - 92
  • [5] Significant Decreasing Incidence of Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis in the Dutch Population of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
    Betjes, Michiel G. H.
    Habib, Sayed M.
    Boeschoten, Els W.
    Hemke, Aline C.
    Struijk, Dick G.
    Westerhuis, Ralph
    Abrahams, Alferso C.
    Korte, Mario R.
    [J]. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 37 (02): : 230 - +
  • [6] Incremental peritoneal dialysis
    Blake, Peter G.
    Dong, Jie
    Davies, Simon J.
    [J]. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 40 (03): : 320 - 326
  • [7] Incremental peritoneal dialysis: Clinical outcomes and residual kidney function preservation
    Borras Sans, Merce
    Chacon Camacho, Andrea
    Cerda Vilaplana, Carla
    Uson Nuno, Ana
    Fernandez, Elvira
    [J]. NEFROLOGIA, 2016, 36 (03): : 299 - 303
  • [8] Caravaca F, 1999, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V19, P350
  • [9] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis
    Cooper, Bruce A.
    Branley, Pauline
    Bulfone, Liliana
    Collins, John F.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Fraenkel, Margaret B.
    Harris, Anthony
    Johnson, David W.
    Kesselhut, Joan
    Li, Jing Jing
    Luxton, Grant
    Pilmore, Andrew
    Tiller, David J.
    Harris, David C.
    Pollock, Carol A.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (07) : 609 - 619
  • [10] De Vecchi AF, 2000, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V20, P412