Validation set sampling strategies for predictive process monitoring

被引:2
作者
Peeperkorn, Jari [1 ]
vanden Broucke, Seppe [1 ,2 ]
De Weerdt, Jochen [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Res Ctr Informat Syst Engn LIRIS, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Business Informat & Operat Management, Ghent, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Process mining; Predictive process monitoring; LSTM; Generalization; Validation set; Log completeness;
D O I
10.1016/j.is.2023.102330
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Previous studies investigating the efficacy of long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks in predictive process monitoring and their ability to capture the underlying process structure have raised concerns about their limited ability to generalize to unseen behavior. Event logs often fail to capture the full spectrum of behavior permitted by the underlying processes. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces innovative validation set sampling strategies based on control-flow variant-based resampling. These strategies have undergone extensive evaluation to assess their impact on hyperparameter selection and early stopping, resulting in notable enhancements to the generalization capabilities of trained LSTM models. In addition, this study expands the experimental framework to enable accurate interpretation of underlying process models and provide valuable insights. By conducting experiments with event logs representing process models of varying complexities, this research elucidates the effectiveness of the proposed validation strategies. Furthermore, the extended framework facilitates investigations into the influence of event log completeness on the learning quality of predictive process models. The novel validation set sampling strategies proposed in this study facilitate the development of more effective and reliable predictive process models, ultimately bolstering generalization capabilities and improving the understanding of underlying process dynamics.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Predictive process monitoring for collaborative business processes: concepts and application [J].
Andrea Delgado ;
Daniel Calegari ;
Carolina Espino ;
Nicolás Ribero .
Discover Analytics, 3 (1)
[22]   Predictive process monitoring: concepts, challenges, and future research directions [J].
Paolo Ceravolo ;
Marco Comuzzi ;
Jochen De Weerdt ;
Chiara Di Francescomarino ;
Fabrizio Maria Maggi .
Process Science, 1 (1)
[23]   Predictive Process Monitoring Methods: Which One Suits Me Best? [J].
Di Francescomarino, Chiara ;
Ghidini, Chiara ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Milani, Fredrik .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT (BPM 2018), 2018, 11080 :462-479
[24]   Complex Symbolic Sequence Clustering and Multiple Classifiers for Predictive Process Monitoring [J].
Verenich, Ilya ;
Dumas, Marlon ;
La Rosa, Marcello ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Di Francescomarino, Chiara .
BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT WORKSHOPS, (BPM 2015), 2016, 256 :218-229
[25]   Performance-preserving event log sampling for predictive monitoring [J].
Sani, Mohammadreza Fani ;
Vazifehdoostirani, Mozhgan ;
Park, Gyunam ;
Pegoraro, Marco ;
van Zelst, Sebastiaan J. ;
van der Aalst, Wil M. P. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 61 (01) :53-82
[26]   Performance-preserving event log sampling for predictive monitoring [J].
Mohammadreza Fani Sani ;
Mozhgan Vazifehdoostirani ;
Gyunam Park ;
Marco Pegoraro ;
Sebastiaan J. van Zelst ;
Wil M. P. van der Aalst .
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2023, 61 :53-82
[27]   Predictive Monitoring of Business Process Execution Delays [J].
Ben Fradj, Walid ;
Turki, Mohamed .
ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, ICIKS 2023, 2024, 486 :114-128
[28]   Genetic Algorithms for AutoML in Process Predictive Monitoring [J].
Kwon, Nahyun ;
Comuzzi, Marco .
PROCESS MINING WORKSHOPS, ICPM 2022, 2023, 468 :242-254
[29]   Clustering-Based Predictive Process Monitoring [J].
Di Francescomarino, Chiara ;
Dumas, Marlon ;
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria ;
Teinemaa, Irene .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SERVICES COMPUTING, 2019, 12 (06) :896-909
[30]   Counterfactual Explanations for Predictive Business Process Monitoring [J].
Huang, Tsung-Hao ;
Metzger, Andreas ;
Pohl, Klaus .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (EMCIS 2021), 2022, 437 :399-413