Accuracy and Potential Interferences of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors in the Hospital

被引:14
作者
Bellido, Virginia [1 ,2 ]
Freckman, Guido [3 ]
Perez, Antonio [4 ]
Galindo, Rodolfo J. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Unidad Gest Clin Endocrinol & Nutr, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Inst Biomed Sevilla IBiS, CSIC, Seville, Spain
[3] Univ Ulm, Inst Diabet Technol, Forsch & Entwicklungsgesell mbH, Ulm, Germany
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp St Creu i St Pau, Serv Endocrinol & Nutr, IIB St Pau,CIBER Diabet & Enfermedades Metab Asoc, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Miami, FL USA
[6] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Med, 1450 NW 10th Ave, Suite 202, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
Accuracy; CGM; glucose monitoring; inpatient diabetes; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; OPERATING-ROOM; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; CGM; SAFETY; IMPLEMENTATION; FEASIBILITY; EVERSENSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eprac.2023.06.007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
For years, the standard of care for monitoring dysglycemia in hospitalized patients was capillary blood glucose (CBG) testing with point-of-care glucose meters. Recently, there has been a revolution in novel factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. Newer CGMs are smaller and less expensive, have improved accuracy and longer wear time, and do not require fingerstick CBG for calibration, resulting in increased utilization in ambulatory settings. Consequently, hospitals have noticed increased usability of CGMs among hospitalized patients and expect a progressive continued increase. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a critical need for innovative approaches to glycemic monitoring, with several pilot implementation projects using CGM in the intensive care unit and non-intensive care unit settings, further boosting the evidence in this area. Hence, recent guidelines have provided recommendations for the use of CGM in specific hospital scenarios and highlighted the potential of CGM to overcome CBG limitations for glucose monitoring in the inpatient setting. In this review, we provide the following: 1) an up-to-date review of the accuracy of the newer CGMs in hospitalized patients, 2) a discussion of standards for CGM accuracy metrics, 3) a contemporary overview of potential interferences that may cause inaccuracies or poor CGM performance, and 4) required steps for full regulatory approval of CGMs in the hospital and future research steps to advance the field forward. (c) 2023 AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 927
页数:9
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [31] Use of Continuous Glucose Monitor in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Requiring Insulin Infusion: An Observational Study
    Faulds, Eileen R.
    Boutsicaris, Andrew
    Sumner, Lyndsey
    Jones, Laureen
    McNett, Molly
    Smetana, Keaton S.
    May, Casey C.
    Buschur, Elizabeth
    Exline, Matthew C.
    Ringel, Matthew D.
    Dungan, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2021, 106 (10) : E4007 - E4016
  • [32] Facilitators and Barriers to Nursing Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
    Faulds, Eileen R.
    Jones, Laureen
    McNett, Molly
    Smetana, Keaton S.
    May, Casey C.
    Sumner, Lyndsey
    Buschur, Elizabeth
    Exline, Matthew
    Ringel, Matthew D.
    Dungan, Kathleen
    [J]. ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (04) : 354 - 361
  • [33] Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults
    Finfer, Simon
    Wernerman, Jan
    Preiser, Jean-Charles
    Cass, Tony
    Desaive, Thomas
    Hovorka, Roman
    Joseph, Jeffrey I.
    Kosiborod, Mikhail
    Krinsley, James
    Mackenzie, Iain
    Mesotten, Dieter
    Schultz, Marcus J.
    Scott, Mitchell G.
    Slingerland, Robbert
    Van den Berghe, Greet
    Van Herpe, Tom
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (03):
  • [34] CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING: A CONSENSUS CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
    Fonseca, Vivian A.
    Grunberger, George
    Anhalt, Henry
    Bailey, Timothy S.
    Blevins, Thomas
    Garg, Satish K.
    Handelsman, Yehuda
    Hirsch, Irl B.
    Orzeck, Eric A.
    Roberts, Victor Lawrence
    Tamborlane, William
    [J]. ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2016, 22 (08) : 1008 - 1021
  • [35] State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018
    Foster, Nicole C.
    Beck, Roy W.
    Miller, Kellee M.
    Clements, Mark A.
    Rickels, Michael R.
    DiMeglio, Linda A.
    Maahs, David M.
    Tamborlane, William V.
    Bergenstal, Richard
    Smith, Elizabeth
    Olson, Beth A.
    Garg, Satish K.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 (02) : 66 - 72
  • [36] Accuracy of a Feasibility Version of an Intravenous Continuous Glucose Monitor in Volunteers with Diabetes and Hospitalized Patients
    Foubert, Luc A.
    Lecomte, Patrick V.
    Nobels, Frank R.
    Gulino, Angela M.
    De Decker, Koen H.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 16 (12) : 858 - 866
  • [37] Freckmann Guido, 2019, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V13, P575, DOI 10.1177/1932296818812062
  • [38] freestyle, FreeStyle Libre safety information
  • [39] freestyleserver, FreeStyle Libre 2 User's Manual
  • [40] Increase Access, Reduce Disparities: Recommendations for Modifying Medicaid CGM Coverage Eligibility Criteria
    Galindo, Rodolfo J.
    Aleppo, Grazia
    Parkin, Christopher G.
    Baidal, David A.
    Carlson, Anders L.
    Cengiz, Eda
    Forlenza, Gregory P.
    Kruger, Davida F.
    Levy, Carol
    McGill, Janet B.
    Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 18 (04): : 974 - 987