Clinical Documentation of Patient Identities in the Electronic Health Record: Ethical Principles to Consider

被引:0
作者
Decker, Suzanne E. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Farook, Minnah W. [1 ,2 ]
Meshberg-Cohen, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Matsuura, Taiki [1 ,2 ]
Manning, Maggie [1 ,2 ]
Abel, Erica A. [1 ,2 ]
Blakley, Laura [1 ]
Prelli, Faith [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, Dept Psychol, West Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT USA
[4] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, Dept Psychol, 116B, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
关键词
patient-centered care; electronic health records; ethics; identity; diversity; STIGMATIZING LABELS; SEXUAL ORIENTATION; CARE SETTINGS; EXPERIENCES; ETHNICITY; VETERANS; RACE; LGBT; REAPPROPRIATION; TRANSGENDER;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000816
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The American Psychological Association's multicultural guidelines encourage psychologists to use language sensitive to the lived experiences of the individuals they serve. In organized care settings, psychologists have important decisions to make about the language they use in the electronic health record (EHR), which may be accessible to both the patient and other health care providers. Language about patient identities (including but not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation) is especially important, but little guidance exists for psychologists on how and when to document these identities in the EHR. Moreover, organizational mandates, patient preferences, fluid identities, and shifting language may suggest different documentation approaches, posing ethical dilemmas for psychologists to navigate. In this article, we review the purposes of documentation in organized care settings, review how each of the five American Psychological Association Code of Ethics' General Principles relates to identity language in EHR documentation, and propose a set of questions for psychologists to ask themselves and their patients when making choices about documenting identity variables in the EHR. Impact Statement Psychologists in organized care settings may face ethical dilemmas about what language to use when documenting patient identities (race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and so on) in the electronic health record. This article provides a framework for considering how to navigate these decisions based on the American Psychological Association Code of Ethics' five General Principles. To guide psychologists in decision making, questions to ask self and patient are included, as well as suggestions for further study.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 600
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study
    Alpert, Ash B.
    Mehringer, Jamie E.
    Orta, Sunshine J.
    Redwood, Emile
    Hernandez, Tresne
    Rivers, Lexis
    Manzano, Charlie
    Ruddick, Roman
    Adams, Spencer
    Cerulli, Catherine
    Operario, Don
    Griggs, Jennifer J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 38 (04) : 970 - 977
  • [2] American Psychological Association, 2023, DISCUSSION APA ETHIC
  • [3] American Psychological Association, 2021, APA resolution on sexual orientation change efforts
  • [4] American Psychological Association, 2023, ETH COD TASK FORC
  • [5] American Psychological Association, 2021, INCLUSIVE LANGUAGE G
  • [6] Record keeping guidelines
    不详
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 62 (09) : 993 - 1004
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, Am Psychol, V65, P493, DOI 10.1037/a0020168
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2009, REPORT AM PSYCHOL AS
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, MULTICULTURAL GUIDEL
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2016, 21 CENT CAR ACT PUB