RESEARCH-IMPROVISATION: COMPOSITIONS BETWEEN CHAOS, THE REAL, SIGNS, AND REALITIES- A PROPOSITION

This study proposes a research-improvisation. For this, after briefly introducing the problematic to be analyzed, we take history theory, especially Cultural History, to set the drama between the signs of the real, its understanding, and we draw distinctions among chaos, the real, and reality from a post-structuralist perspective to, at the end, propose certain procedures of this proposition in context. Thus, we argue in favor of research that takes unpredictability as a potential, from a precursor chaos actualized in the real which formalizes itself, via language, into realities. We suggest postures regarding research authorship processed by a decentered individuality in a game dramatized in research given its reciprocal assemblages with other bodies, objects, things, and ideas. An understanding that evokes post-social studies, via an implicit critique of anthropocentrism, in favor of a perspective in which unpredictability manifests itself as immanent to decentered interactions between multiple bodies and in which research-improvisation asserts itself as an effort to understand plurivocal relations. potential, from a precursor chaos actualized in the real which formalizes itself, via language, into realities. We suggest postures regarding research authorship processed by a decentered individuality in a game dramatized in research given its reciprocal assemblages with other bodies, objects, things, and ideas. An understanding that evokes post-social studies, via an implicit critique of anthropocentrism, in favor of a perspective in which unpredictability manifests itself as immanent to decentered interactions between multiple bodies and in which research-improvisation asserts itself as an effort to understand plurivocal relations.