Comparison between random forest and support vector machine algorithms for LULC classification

被引:66
作者
Avci, Cengiz [1 ]
Budak, Muhammed [1 ]
Yagmur, Nur [1 ]
Balcik, Filiz Bektas [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND GEOSCIENCES | 2023年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
Remote sensing; Supervised Classification; Random Forest; Support Vector Machine; Wetland; LAND-COVER;
D O I
10.26833/ijeg.987605
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Nowadays, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely chosen for classifying satellite images for mapping Earth's surface. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) stand out among these algorithms with their accurate results in the literature. The aim of this study is to analyze the performances of these algorithms on land use and land cover (LULC) classification, especially wetlands which have significant ecological functions. For this purpose, Sentinel-2 satellite image, which is freely provided by European Space Agency (ESA), was used to monitor not only the open surface water body but also around Marmara Lake. The performance evaluation was made with the increasing number of the training dataset. 3 different training datasets having 10, 15, and 20 areas of interest (AOI) per class, respectively were used for the classification of the satellite images acquired in 2015 and 2020. The most accurate results were obtained from the classification with RF algorithm and 20 AOIs. According to obtained results, the change detection analysis of Marmara Lake was investigated for possible reasons. Whereas the water body and wetland have decreased more than 50% between 2015 and 2020, crop sites have increased approximately 50%.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Canadian Wetland Inventory using Google Earth Engine: The First Map and Preliminary Results
    Amani, Meisam
    Mahdavi, Sahel
    Afshar, Majid
    Brisco, Brian
    Huang, Weimin
    Mirzadeh, Sayyed Mohammad Javad
    White, Lori
    Banks, Sarah
    Montgomery, Joshua
    Hopkinson, Christopher
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [2] Comparing Thresholding with Machine Learning Classifiers for Mapping Complex Water
    Bangira, Tsitsi
    Alfieri, Silvia Maria
    Menenti, Massimo
    van Niekerk, Adriaan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [3] Basu T, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-83512-6
  • [4] Decision-Tree, Rule-Based, and Random Forest Classification of High-Resolution Multispectral Imagery for Wetland Mapping and Inventory
    Berhane, Tedros M.
    Lane, Charles R.
    Wu, Qiusheng
    Autrey, Bradley C.
    Anenkhonov, Oleg A.
    Chepinoga, Victor V.
    Liu, Hongxing
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [5] Breiman L, 1999, Technical Report 567
  • [6] A tutorial on Support Vector Machines for pattern recognition
    Burges, CJC
    [J]. DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 1998, 2 (02) : 121 - 167
  • [7] Canty M.J., 2014, Image Analysis, Classification and Change Detection in Remote Sensing: With Algorithms for ENVI/IDL and Python, V3rd
  • [8] DeFries RS, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P249, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:LCBHNA]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Mapping the Dabus Wetlands, Ethiopia, Using Random Forest Classification of Landsat, PALSAR and Topographic Data
    Dubeau, Pierre
    King, Douglas J.
    Unbushe, Dikaso Gojamme
    Rebelo, Lisa-Maria
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (10)