Portfolio allocation strategy for active learning Kriging-based structural reliability analysis

被引:15
作者
Hong, Linxiong [1 ,2 ]
Shang, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shizheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Huacong [3 ]
Cheng, Jiaming [4 ]
机构
[1] Minist Ind & Informat Technol Elect, Res Inst 5, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab MIIT Intelligent Prod Testing & Reliabil, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Power & Energy, Xian, Peoples R China
[4] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Structural reliability analysis; Portfolio allocation; Kriging; Active learning; Failure probability;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2023.116066
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Recently, numerous studies have focused on structural reliability analysis, with the Kriging-based active learning method being particularly popular. A variety of Kriging-based learning functions have been proposed, and shown to perform well in various tasks. However, no single learning function has been demonstrated to consistently outperformed the others in all tasks, and selecting the most appropriate learning function for a given task remains a challenge in engineering applications. In this paper, inspired by the multi-armed bandit strategy, a portfolio allocation of different learning functions is proposed to resolve the issue of selecting a single one, where the better learning functions are selected online according to their past performance. Finally, three classical numerical examples and two engineering applications are adopted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Subset simulation method including fitness-based seed selection for reliability analysis
    Abdollahi, Azam
    Moghaddam, Mehdi Azhdary
    Monfared, Seyed Arman Hashemi
    Rashki, Mohsen
    Li, Yong
    [J]. ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2021, 37 (04) : 2689 - 2705
  • [2] AK-SESC: a novel reliability procedure based on the integration of active learning kriging and sequential space conversion method
    Ameryan, Ala
    Ghalehnovi, Mansour
    Rashki, Mohsen
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 217
  • [3] A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations
    Au, SK
    Beck, JL
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 1999, 21 (02) : 135 - 158
  • [4] Auer P, 1995, AN S FDN CO, P322, DOI 10.1109/SFCS.1995.492488
  • [5] Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions
    Bichon, B. J.
    Eldred, M. S.
    Swiler, L. P.
    Mahadevan, S.
    McFarland, J. M.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2008, 46 (10) : 2459 - 2468
  • [6] Cheng JM, 2021, J BRAZ SOC MECH SCI, V43, DOI [10.1007/s40430-021-03257-1, 10.13393/j.cnki.issn.1672-948X.2021.03.001]
  • [7] Chaotic enhanced colliding bodies optimization algorithm for structural reliability analysis
    Cheng, Jiaming
    Zhao, Wei
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (03) : 438 - 453
  • [8] Rare event estimation with sequential directional importance sampling
    Cheng, Kai
    Papaioannou, Iason
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    Wang, Yanping
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2023, 100
  • [9] Structural reliability analysis based on ensemble learning of surrogate models
    Cheng, Kai
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2020, 83
  • [10] AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation
    Echard, B.
    Gayton, N.
    Lemaire, M.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2011, 33 (02) : 145 - 154