Geomagnetic Activity Following Interplanetary Shocks in Solar Cycles 23 and 24

被引:4
|
作者
Echer, Ezequiel [1 ]
Lucas, Aline de [2 ]
Hajra, Rajkumar [3 ,6 ]
Franco, Adriane Marques de Souza [4 ]
Bolzan, Mauricio J. A. [5 ]
Nascimento, Luis Eduardo Sales do [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[2] Inst Fed Educ Ciencia & Tecnol Sao Paulo, Jacarei, Brazil
[3] Indian Inst Technol Indore, Indore, India
[4] Univ Fed Sul & Sudeste Para, Maraba, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Jatai, Jatai, Brazil
[6] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, CAS Key Lab Geospace Environm, Hefei, Peoples R China
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Solar wind; Shock waves; Coronal mass ejections; Magnetic reconnection; Magnetosphere; Geomagnetic disturbances; Solar cycle; CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS; INTERACTION REGIONS; MINIMUM; ORIGIN; WIND; GEOEFFECTIVENESS; PARAMETERS; DRIVERS; INTENSE; STORMS;
D O I
10.1007/s13538-023-01294-w
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Interplanetary shocks are important precursors of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) and corotating interaction regions (CIRs). The shock compression and draping effects on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) in sheaths can lead to significant geomagnetic activity. We identified 297 fast forward shocks observed by the Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft upstream of the Earth, and analyzed their geomagnetic impacts in solar cycle (SC) 23 (1998-2008) and SC24 (2009-2018). The shock (normalized) occurrence rate is found to be significantly higher during SC23 compared to SC24, and it exhibits a stronger correlation with the sunspot number during SC23 (correlation coefficient r = 0.93) than during SC24 (r = 0.86). The average shock compressions of the IMF magnitude and plasma density are approximate to 2.0 and approximate to 2.4, respectively, with no significant correlation with geomagnetic activity. Variations of solar wind parameters and geomagnetic activity indices following the shock arrival are explored. An interval of 6 h (3 days) following the shock is characterized by the average peak values of solar wind speed V-sw = 525 (610) km s(-1), IMF B-z = -6.5 (-11.1) nT, and electric field E-y = 3.5 (6.1) mV m(-1), followed by the average peak geomagnetic indices of Dst = -36 (-83) nT, ap = 56 (92) nT, and AE = 733 (1061) nT. About 25% and 63% of the shocks are followed by geomagnetic storms with Dst <= -50 nT in the following 6-h and 3-day periods, respectively. The percentages of shocks followed by the auroral activity level AE > 500 nT are approximate to 65% and approximate to 96% for the short and long intervals, respectively. For the ap activity level (> 56 nT), the geoeffective shocks are approximate to 30 % and approximate to 60%, respectively. The overall increase in the geomagnetic activity after the shock arrival for the longer shock-preceded interval is possibly due to inclusion of contributions from shock driver (ICME or CIR) fields. It can be concluded that an interplanetary fast forward shock has a probability of 1/4 to be followed by geomagnetic storms, and of 2/3 to be followed by significant auroral activity. We derived probability distribution functions of geomagnetic indices for the 6-h and 3-day intervals following shocks. The results might be important for space weather modeling and applications.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geomagnetic Activity Following Interplanetary Shocks in Solar Cycles 23 and 24
    Ezequiel Echer
    Aline de Lucas
    Rajkumar Hajra
    Adriane Marques de Souza Franco
    Mauricio J. A. Bolzan
    Luis Eduardo Sales do Nascimento
    Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2023, 53
  • [2] How Different Are the Solar Wind-Interplanetary Conditions and the Consequent Geomagnetic Activity During the Ascending and Early Descending Phases of the Solar Cycles 23 and 24?
    Rawat, Rashmi
    Echer, E.
    Gonzalez, W. D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2018, 123 (08) : 6621 - 6638
  • [3] Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Coupling Efficiency and Its Dependence on Solar Activity During Geomagnetic Storms of 23-24 Solar Cycles
    Ashna, V. M.
    Bhaskar, Ankush
    Manju, G.
    Sini, R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2024, 129 (08)
  • [4] Distribution and recovery phase of geomagnetic storms during solar cycles 23 and 24
    Mishra, Wageesh
    Sahani, Preity Sukla
    Khuntia, Soumyaranjan
    Chakrabarty, Dibyendu
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 530 (03) : 3171 - 3182
  • [5] Forecasting Periods of Strong Southward Magnetic Field Following Interplanetary Shocks
    Salman, T. M.
    Lugaz, N.
    Farrugia, C. J.
    Winslow, R. M.
    Galvin, A. B.
    Schwadron, N. A.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 16 (12): : 2004 - 2021
  • [6] Solar and interplanetary precursors of geomagnetic storms in solar cycle 23
    Uwamahoro, J.
    McKinnell, L. -A.
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (03) : 395 - 410
  • [7] Interplanetary Scintillation Observations of Solar-Wind Disturbances During Cycles 23 and 24
    Tokumaru, Munetoshi
    Fujiki, Ken'ichi
    Iwai, Kazumasa
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2023, 298 (02)
  • [8] Study of Geomagnetic Storms and Solar and Interplanetary Parameters for Solar Cycles 22 and 24
    Pokharia, Meena
    Prasad, Lalan
    Bhoj, Chandrashekhar
    Mathpal, Chandni
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2018, 293 (09)
  • [9] Forbush Decreases and Associated Geomagnetic Storms: Statistical Comparison in Solar Cycles 23 and 24
    Melkumyan, A. A.
    Belov, A. V.
    Shlyk, N. S.
    Abunina, M. A.
    Abunin, A. A.
    Oleneva, V. A.
    Yanke, V. G.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2024, 299 (03)
  • [10] Geomagnetic activity triggered by interplanetary shocks
    Yue, C.
    Zong, Q. G.
    Zhang, H.
    Wang, Y. F.
    Yuan, C. J.
    Pu, Z. Y.
    Fu, S. Y.
    Lui, A. T. Y.
    Yang, B.
    Wang, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2010, 115