Surrogate Modeling of Agent-Based Airport Terminal Operations

被引:2
作者
De Leeuw, Benyamin [1 ]
Ziabari, S. Sahand Mohammadi [1 ]
Sharpanskykh, Alexei [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
来源
MULTI-AGENT-BASED SIMULATION XXIII, MABS 2022 | 2023年 / 13743卷
关键词
Surrogate modeling; Agent-based model; Random forest; METHODOLOGY; METAMODELS; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-22947-3_7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The airport terminals are complex sociotechnical systems, which are difficult to understand and their behavior is hard to predict. Hence, an agent-based model, the Agent-based Airport Terminal Operation Model (AATOM), has been designed to represent and analyze diverse airport terminal processes, actors, their behavior and interactions. The main issue with such models is the large computational requirements for simulating detailed processes, making it computationally inefficient. Furthermore, the dynamics of such models are difficult to understand. Therefore, the goal of this research is to approximate the dynamics of AATOM by a surrogate model, while preserving the important system properties. A methodology is suggested for training and validating a surrogate model, based on the Random Forest algorithm. The trained surrogate model is capable of approximating the AATOM simulation and identifying relative importance of the model variables with respect to the model outputs. Firstly, the results obtained contain an evaluation of the surrogate model accuracy performance, indicating that the surrogate model can achieve an average accuracy of 93% in comparison to the original agent-based simulation model. Nonetheless, one indicator, the number of missed flights, has shown to be more difficult to predict, with an average accuracy of 83%. Secondly, the results show that the airport resource allocation has an important impact on the efficiency of the airport terminal, with the two most important variables being the number of desks at the check-in and the number of lanes at the checkpoint. Last, the developed surrogate model was compared with a second Artificial Neural Network-based surrogate model built for the same agent-based model.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 94
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INTRO STAT LEARNING
[2]   A Systematic Approach for Variable Selection With Random Forests: Achieving Stable Variable Importance Values [J].
Behnamian, Amir ;
Millard, Koreen ;
Banks, Sarah N. ;
White, Lori ;
Richardson, Murray ;
Pasher, Jon .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2017, 14 (11) :1988-1992
[3]  
Bergstra J, 2011, P 24 INT C NEURAL IN, V24
[4]   A random forest guided tour [J].
Biau, Gerard ;
Scornet, Erwan .
TEST, 2016, 25 (02) :197-227
[5]   Overview of random forest methodology and practical guidance with emphasis on computational biology and bioinformatics [J].
Boulesteix, Anne-Laure ;
Janitza, Silke ;
Kruppa, Jochen ;
Koenig, Inke R. .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2012, 2 (06) :493-507
[6]  
Branco P, 2015, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1505.01658, DOI 10.1145/2907070, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1505.01658, 10.48550/arXiv.1505.01658]
[7]   Exploring the behavior space of agent-based simulation models using random forest metamodels and sequential sampling [J].
Edali, Mert ;
Yucel, Gonenc .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2019, 92 :62-81
[8]  
Garson G.D, 1991, AI Expert, V6, P46, DOI [10.5555/129449.129452, DOI 10.5555/129449.129452]
[9]  
Goodfellow I, 2016, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1
[10]  
Janssen S., 2020, CAPTURING AGENTS SEC