Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Association Analysis of Female and Male Fig Genotypes (Ficus carica L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Ikten, Hatice [1 ]
Gulsen, Osman [2 ]
Mutlu, Nedim [1 ]
Polat, Ilknur [3 ]
Aksoy, Uygun [4 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Biotechnol, Antalya, Turkiye
[2] Erciyes Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Hort, Kayseri, Turkiye
[3] Akdeniz Univ, Elmali Vocat Sch, Antalya, Turkiye
[4] Ege Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Hort, Izmir, Turkiye
来源
ERWERBS-OBSTBAU | 2023年 / 65卷 / 05期
关键词
Association mapping; Molecular characterization; Molecular markers; ISSR; SRAP; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; SEX DETERMINATION; MARKERS; IDENTIFICATION; SOFTWARE; TRAITS; ISSR; RAPD;
D O I
10.1007/s10341-023-00844-5
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The genotypic classification of the genetic resources and development of molecular markers for important traits could be very informative for breeding programs. The aim of the study was to analyze the genetic relationship within and between the male and female fig (Ficus carica L.) population and perform association analysis for developing molecular markers linked to sex expression in natural populations of figs. In total, 47 male and 49 female fig genotypes originating from different geographic regions of Turkey (two genotypes from the USA) were used as plant material and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP), male-specific marker-SRAP (MS-SRAP), and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) primers were employed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. A total of 62 primers produced in total 353 markers, 149 of which were polymorphic. The average number of polymorphic markers for SRAP, MS-SRAP, and ISSR were 2.14, 2.75, and 2.3, respectively. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) and principal component analyses (PCA) successfully distinguished the genotypes but did not group them strictly based on gender or their geographic origins. The average genetic similarity among the fig genotypes based on combined data of ISSR, SRAP, and MS-SRAP was 0.65, with a range of 0.57-0.92. STRUCTURE analysis grouped the genotypes under four subpopulations and the genotypes were partially grouped according to their genders based on combined data. As a result of association analysis, the marker MS2FEM10 derived by combining the previously developed male-specific amplified fragment-length polymorphism (AFLP) marker (Parrish et al. 2004) with an SRAP marker explained the 66% of the total variation alone. The MS2FEM10 marker together with MS1RM12, M10E11, M3E14, and M5E10 explained 77% of the total variation for male/female characters. The genetic relationship between fig genotypes was revealed, and association mapping was successfully employed in natural populations of F. carica with three different PCR-based marker systems. Increasing the number of markers may result in the identification of tightly linked or gene-specific markers in natural populations of F. carica.
引用
收藏
页码:1603 / 1616
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Molecular assessment of polymorphism among local Jordanian genotypes of the common fig (Ficus carica L.)
    Sadder, MT
    Ateyyeh, AF
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2006, 107 (04) : 347 - 351
  • [42] POMOLOGICAL TRAITS OF FIG (Ficus carica L.) GENOTYPES COLLECTED IN THE WEST MEDITERRANEAN REGION IN TURKEY
    Gozlekci, Sadiye
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 2011, 21 (04): : 646 - 652
  • [43] Comparative Assessment of SSR and AFLP Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Conservation of Fig, Ficus carica L., Genetic Resources in Tunisia
    Baraket, Ghada
    Chatti, Khaled
    Saddoud, Olfa
    Ben Abdelkarim, Ahmed
    Mars, Messaoud
    Trifi, Mokhtar
    Hannachi, Amel Salhi
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2011, 29 (01) : 171 - 184
  • [44] Comparative Assessment of SSR and AFLP Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Conservation of Fig, Ficus carica L., Genetic Resources in Tunisia
    Ghada Baraket
    Khaled Chatti
    Olfa Saddoud
    Ahmed Ben Abdelkarim
    Messaoud Mars
    Mokhtar Trifi
    Amel Salhi Hannachi
    Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2011, 29 : 171 - 184
  • [45] A survey and morphological evaluation of fig (Ficus carica L.) genetic resources from Slovenia
    Podgornik, Maja
    Vuk, Irma
    Vrhovnik, Irena
    Mavsar, Dunja Bandelj
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2010, 125 (03) : 380 - 389
  • [46] Inter-simple sequence repeat fingerprints to assess genetic diversity in Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) germplasm
    Amel, SH
    Mokhtar, T
    Salwa, Z
    Jihène, H
    Messaoud, M
    Abdelmajid, R
    Mohamed, M
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2004, 51 (03) : 269 - 275
  • [47] Colletotrichum species associated with fig (Ficus carica L.) in Malaysia
    Nur-Shakirah, Abdul Omar
    Khadijah, Mohd Safie
    Kee, Yee Jia
    Chew, Bee Lynn
    Zakaria, Latiffah
    Nor, Nik Mohd Izham Mohamed
    Subramaniam, Sreeramanan
    Leong, Yin-Hui
    Mohd, Masratul Hawa
    CROP PROTECTION, 2023, 169
  • [48] Identification of the EPR signals of fig leaves (Ficus carica L.)
    Nasibova, Aygun
    Khalilov, Rovshan
    Abiyev, Huseyn
    Trubitsin, Boris
    Eftekhari, Aziz
    EURASIAN CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 3 (03): : 193 - 199
  • [49] EVALUATION OF BORON TOXICITY IN FIG (Ficus carica L.) CULTIVARS
    Kaptan, Mustafa Ali
    Aydin, Mehmet
    Dalkilic, Zeynel
    AGROLIFE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 2014, 3 (01): : 75 - 80
  • [50] Reducing fresh fig (Ficus carica L.) postharvest losses
    Crisosto, C. H.
    Michailides, T. J.
    Ferguson, L.
    Lopez-Corrales, M.
    Crisosto, G.
    VI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FIG, 2021, 1310 : 165 - 171