Winners and Losers? The Effect of Gaining and Losing Access to Selective Colleges on Education and Labor Market Outcomest

被引:31
作者
Black, Sandra E. [1 ,2 ]
Denning, Jeffrey T. [3 ,4 ]
Rothstein, Jesse [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, IZA, NBER, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] NHH, Bergen, Norway
[3] Brigham Young Univ, IZA, Provo, UT USA
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, IZA, Berkeley, CA USA
关键词
10 PERCENT LAW; SCHOOL CHOICE; ADMISSIONS; UNIVERSITY; QUALITY; ENROLLMENT; EARNINGS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1257/app.20200137
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We use the introduction of the Texas Top Ten Percent rule to esti-mate the effect of access to a selective college on graduation and earnings outcomes for two groups of students. For highly ranked students at more disadvantaged high schools, who gained access under the policy, college enrollment and graduation increased. Less highly ranked students at more advantaged schools, who tended to lose access, shifted toward less-selective colleges under the pol-icy, but did not see declines in overall college enrollment, gradu-ation, or earnings. The policy thus benefited students targeted for admission without evidence of adverse effects on displaced students. (JEL I21, I23, I24, I26)
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 67
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Recruiting and supporting low-income, high-achieving students at flagship universities [J].
Andrews, Rodney J. ;
Imberman, Scott A. ;
Lovenheim, Michael F. .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2020, 74
[2]   Quantile Treatment Effects of College Quality on Earnings [J].
Andrews, Rodney J. ;
Li, Jing ;
Lovenheim, Michael F. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2016, 51 (01) :200-238
[3]   THE RETURNS TO ELITE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION: A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS [J].
Anelli, Massimo .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2020, 18 (06) :2824-2868
[4]   University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California [J].
Arcidiacono, Peter ;
Aucejo, Esteban M. ;
Hotz, V. Joseph .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (03) :525-562
[5]  
Armstrong ElizabethA., 2013, Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality
[6]  
Black Sandra E., 2023, REPLICATION DATA WIN, DOI [10.38886/E142541V1, DOI 10.38886/E142541V1]
[7]  
Bleemer Z., 2021, Top percent policies and the return to postsecondary selectivity
[8]   AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, MISMATCH, AND ECONOMIC MOBILITY AFTER CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSITION 209 [J].
Bleemer, Zachary .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 137 (01) :115-160
[9]   WHERE IS THE LAND OF OPPORTUNITY? THE GEOGRAPHY OF INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY IN THE UNITED STATES [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Hendren, Nathaniel ;
Kline, Patrick ;
Saez, Emmanuel .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 129 (04) :1553-1623
[10]   Merit Aid, College Quality, and College Completion: Massachusetts' Adams Scholarship as an In-Kind Subsidy [J].
Cohodes, Sarah R. ;
Goodman, Joshua S. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 6 (04) :251-285