Promotion of Egg Production Rate and Quality Using Limosilactobacillus oris BSLO 1801, a Potential Probiotic Screened from Feces of Laying Hens with Higher Egg Productive Performance

被引:6
作者
Wan, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Sun, Ning [1 ]
Luo, Min [1 ]
Gan, Baoxing [1 ]
Yao, Zhipeng [1 ]
Cao, Xi [1 ]
Wang, Hesong [2 ]
Pan, Kangcheng [1 ]
Shu, Gang [1 ]
Zeng, Yan [1 ]
Zeng, Dong [1 ]
Ni, Xueqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Vet Med, Anim Microecol Inst, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Inst Gastroenterol Guangdong Prov, Dept Gastroenterol,Guangdong Prov Key Lab Gastroe, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Laying hens; Gut microbiome; High-throughput sequencing; Probiotics; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTATION; BACILLUS-LICHENIFORMIS; GUT MICROBIOTA; CHOLESTEROL; MICROFLORA; HEALTH; SERUM; LACTOBACILLI; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s12602-021-09856-7
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this experiment, laying hens were divided into a high productive group (group H) and a low productive group (group L). The purpose of this experiment was to screen and isolate a potential probiotic associated with the laying rate from group H by comparing the results via 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. The high-throughput sequencing analysis results showed that there were some differences in the composition of the gut microbiome between groups H and L on the Phylum and Genus levels. Through isolation and identification, we screened 16 lactobacilli strains. Among the 16 strains, S5 showed good acid tolerance, bile salt tolerance, and cholesterol degradation. Therefore, we chose strain S5 (identified as Limosilactobacillus oris, named Limosilactobacillus oris BSLO 1801) as a potential probiotic to promote the productivity of ordinary laying hens. During the animal experiment, 288 Hy-line white hens (30 weeks old) were divided into four groups, with six replications (n = 12) per group. The control group received the basic diet, and the treatment groups received the same basic diet supplemented with 10(7) CFU/kg, 10(8) CFU/kg, and 10(9) CFU/kg of BSLO 1801. The laying hens were acclimated to the environment for 1 week before the initiation of the experiment. Dietary supplementation with 10(7) CFU/kg and 10(9) CFU/kg of BSLO 1801 increased the laying rate significantly, and the potential probiotic improved the egg weight in all treatment groups. Additionally, the cholesterol content of the yolk dropped significantly in the 10(9) CFU/kg group, and the weight of egg yolk was significantly increased in all treatment groups. However, no significant differences in eggshell strength, eggshell thickness, protein height, and Haugh unit were observed among the four groups. These results revealed that lactobacilli spp. are important bacteria of the intestinal microbiome in highly productive laying hens, and BSLO 1801 was isolated as a potential probiotic. Through these animal experiments, we also found that adding BSLO 1801 to the basic diet of laying hens could effectively improve the laying rate, average egg weight, and yolk weight and reduce the cholesterol content in egg yolk.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 547
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis and inulin supplementation on performance, eggshell quality, intestinal morphology and microflora composition of laying hens in the late phase of production [J].
Abdelqader, Anas ;
Al-Fataftah, Abdur-Rahman ;
Das, Guerbuez .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 179 (1-4) :103-111
[2]   Functional and health promoting inherent attributes of Enterococcus hirae F2 as a novel probiotic isolated from the digestive tract of the freshwater fish Catla catla [J].
Adnan, Mohd ;
Patel, Mitesh ;
Hadi, Sibte .
PEERJ, 2017, 5
[3]   Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry [J].
Al-Khalaifah, H. S. .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 2018, 97 (11) :3807-3815
[4]   Dietary Supplementation of Probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus Modulates Cholesterol Levels, Immune Response, and Productive Performance of Laying Hens [J].
Alaqil, Abdulaziz A. ;
Abbas, Ahmed O. ;
El-Beltagi, Hossam S. ;
Abd El-Atty, Hanaa K. ;
Mehaisen, Gamal M. K. ;
Moustafa, Eman S. .
ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (09) :1-12
[5]   A comparison between the effects of a probiotic and an antibiotic on the performance of Desi chickens [J].
Amer, M. Y. ;
Khan, S. H. .
VETERINARY WORLD, 2012, 5 (03) :160-165
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HLTH NUTR PROP PROB
[7]  
Appleby PN, 1999, AM J CLIN NUTR, V70, p525S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/70.3.525s
[8]   Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics on Cytokine Profiles [J].
Azad, Md. Abul Kalam ;
Sarker, Manobendro ;
Wan, Dan .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
[9]   The Gastrointestinal Microbiome: A Review [J].
Barko, P. C. ;
McMichael, M. A. ;
Swanson, K. S. ;
Williams, D. A. .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (01) :9-25
[10]   Plantaricyclin A, a Novel Circular Bacteriocin Produced by Lactobacillus plantarum NI326: Purification, Characterization, and Heterologous Production [J].
Borrero, Juan ;
Kelly, Eoin ;
O'Connor, Paula M. ;
Kelleher, Philip ;
Scully, Colm ;
Cotter, Paul D. ;
Mahony, Jennifer ;
van Sinderen, Douwe .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 84 (01)