Life cycle assessment of hybrid electrodialysis and reverse osmosis seawater desalination systems

被引:10
|
作者
Alrashidi, Asmaa [1 ]
Aleisa, Esra [2 ]
Alshayji, Khawla [3 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Minist Publ Works, Kuwait, Kuwait
[2] Kuwait Univ, Ind & Management Syst Engn Dept, Al Shadadiya, Kuwait
[3] Kuwait Univ, Coll Petr & Engn, Chem Engn Dept, POB 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait
关键词
Electrodialysis; Reverse osmosis; Water recovery; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Water footprint; Kuwait; WATER DESALINATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; CHLORALKALI INDUSTRY; COARSE SALT; RO PLANT; BRINE; TECHNOLOGIES; CONCENTRATE; COST; PRETREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2024.117448
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study investigates the environmental impact (EI) and water footprint (WF) of four seawater (SW) desalination configurations that combine both standalone and hybrid systems of SW reverse osmosis (SWRO) and SW electrodialysis (SWED). The analysis is conducted using life cycle assessment (LCA) and water recovery calculations. The results indicate that the hybrid SWRO-ED configuration has increased water recovery by 18-48 % over standalone SWRO and SWED. However, the SWRO-ED hybrid configuration has decreased membrane performance, which leads to increasing membrane replacement by 1.2-3.7 times compared to standalones SWED and SWRO, respectively. The carbon footprint for the SWRO-ED hybridization is 7.62 kg CO2 eq. per cubic meter of desalinated water compared to 5.35 and 6.48 kg CO2 eq/m3 emitted from SWRO and SWED standalones, respectively. On the other hand, the amending of SWED with brackish water RO (BWRO) consecutively increases water recovery by 8.4-42.1 % while reducing CO2 emissions by 41-51 %. The average WF per cubic meter of desalinated water is 2.46, 3.52, 2.65 and 3.92 m3 for the SWRO standalone, SWED standalone, SWED-BWRO, and SWRO-ED hybrid systems, respectively. Most of the WF is consumed indirectly for electricity or chemical production required for water desalination.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seawater desalination by reverse osmosis (case study)
    Abou Rayan, M
    Khaled, I
    DESALINATION, 2003, 153 (1-3) : 245 - 251
  • [32] Development and extension of seawater desalination by reverse osmosis
    Gao Congjie
    Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2003, 21 (1): : 40 - 45
  • [33] COMPOSITE MEMBRANES FOR SEAWATER DESALINATION BY REVERSE OSMOSIS
    RILEY, RL
    LONSDALE, HK
    LYONS, CR
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1971, 15 (05) : 1267 - &
  • [34] Scaling predictions in seawater reverse osmosis desalination
    Hchaichi, Houda
    Siwar, Saanoun
    Elfil, Hamza
    Hannachi, Ahmed
    MEMBRANE WATER TREATMENT, 2014, 5 (03) : 221 - 233
  • [35] ECONOMICS OF SEAWATER DESALINATION BY REVERSE-OSMOSIS
    EBRAHIM, S
    ABDELJAWAD, M
    DESALINATION, 1994, 99 (01) : 39 - 55
  • [36] Submarine seawater reverse osmosis desalination system
    Pacenti, P
    de Gerloni, M
    Reali, M
    Chiaramonti, D
    Gärtner, SO
    Helm, P
    Stöhr, M
    DESALINATION, 1999, 126 (1-3) : 213 - 218
  • [37] Optimization of reverse osmosis networks for seawater desalination
    Voros, N
    Maroulis, ZB
    MarinosKouris, D
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 20 : S345 - S350
  • [38] Optimization of reverse osmosis networks for seawater desalination
    Comput Chem Eng, Suppl pt A (S345-S350):
  • [39] Hybrid gas turbine-organic Rankine cycle for seawater desalination by reverse osmosis in a hydrocarbon production facility
    Eveloy, Valerie
    Rodgers, Peter
    Qiu, Linyue
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 106 : 1134 - 1148
  • [40] Life Cycle Assessment of a seawater reverse osmosis plant powered by a hybrid energy system (fossil fuel and waste to energy)
    Najjar, Elena
    Al-Hindi, Mahmoud
    Massoud, May
    Saad, Walid
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 (07) : 448 - 465