Smallholder commercialisation and rural household welfare: panel data evidence from Ethiopia

被引:12
作者
Geffersa, Abebayehu Girma [1 ,2 ]
Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul, Jr. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle Business Sch, Coll Human & Social Futures, Callaghan, Australia
[2] CSIRO Agr & Food, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] World Bank Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[4] Univ Free State, Disaster Management Training & Educ Ctr DiMTEC Afr, Bloemfontein Internal Box 66 POB339, Bloemfontein, South Africa
关键词
agricultural commercialisation; household welfare; asset ownership; rural poverty; Ethiopia; AGRICULTURAL COMMERCIALIZATION; MARKET PARTICIPATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; FOOD SECURITY; NUTRITION; PRODUCERS; FARMERS; POVERTY; INCOME; MODEL;
D O I
10.1093/erae/jbad040
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between smallholder commercialisation and rural household welfare. Employing a comprehensive three-wave panel dataset of smallholder maize farmers in Ethiopia, we find a positive association between commercialisation and household income which translates to wealth endowments through asset ownership and accumulation. We also show that commercialisation is associated with poverty reduction by reducing the prevalence of income poverty and the poverty gap. Deep diving into who benefits most from commercialisation, we find that agricultural commercialisation is inclusive and benefits all households. However, the greatest welfare gains accrue to income-poor households, suggesting some potential for reducing rural inequality. These insights support existing evidence that smallholder commercialisation is pro-poor and could be a significant entry point for stirring income growth and development in rural areas. Consequently, supporting poor and marginalised farmers with resources needed to boost agricultural production and commercialisation are relevant steps in the right direction of ensuring integrated rural development.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 90
页数:37
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Birnbaum A., 1968, Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, P397
[13]   Agricultural commercialization and nutrition revisited: Empirical evidence from three African countries [J].
Carletto, Calogero ;
Corral, Paul ;
Guelfi, Anita .
FOOD POLICY, 2017, 67 :106-118
[14]   The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach [J].
Carter, MR ;
Barrett, CB .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2006, 42 (02) :178-199
[15]   The impact of agricultural commercialisation on household welfare in rural Vietnam [J].
Cazzuffi, Chiara ;
McKay, Andy ;
Perge, Emilie .
FOOD POLICY, 2020, 94
[16]   MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION-MODELS FOR PANEL DATA [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1982, 18 (01) :5-46
[17]   PEASANT HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIOR WITH MISSING MARKETS - SOME PARADOXES EXPLAINED [J].
DEJANVRY, A ;
FAFCHAMPS, M ;
SADOULET, E .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1991, 101 (409) :1400-1417
[18]   Peer effects and the choice of adaptation strategies [J].
Di Falco, Salvatore ;
Doku, Angela ;
Mahajan, Avichal .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 51 (01) :17-30
[19]   Does Adaptation to Climate Change Provide Food Security? A Micro-Perspective from Ethiopia [J].
Di Falco, Salvatore ;
Veronesi, Marcella ;
Yesuf, Mahmud .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 93 (03) :825-842
[20]   The new normal? Cluster farming and smallholder commercialization in Ethiopia [J].
Dureti, Guyo Godana ;
Tabe-Ojong, Martin Paul, Jr. ;
Owusu-Sekyere, Enoch .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 54 (06) :900-920