External precast concrete nib beam-to-column connection under elevated temperatures: Experimental and finite element analysis

被引:4
作者
Radzi, Noor Azim Mohd. [1 ]
Hamid, Roszilah [1 ]
Mutalib, Azrul A. [1 ]
Kaish, A. B. M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Dept Civil Engn, UKM, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Precast concrete nib; Beam-to-column connection; Fire performance; Fire resistance tests; Finite element analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105293
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The precast concrete nib is one of the most widely used beam-to-column connections to address the architectural drawback of the ordinary precast concrete corbel. However, precast concrete nib beam-to-column connections are not classified as fully rigid or pin but exhibit semirigid properties. Semirigid connections are at risk of deflection at lower loads and cracking during early fire events. In this study, full-scale fire tests were carried out to determine the thermal and structural behaviour of the external monolithic and precast concrete nib beam-tocolumn connections subjected to 120 min standard cellulose fires. A finite element simulation using ANSYS validated the experimental results based on the internal temperature distributions, load-deflection curves, and stress visualization. Results show that the tension reinforcement of the concrete nib specimen at high temperature was below the critical temperature of 300 degrees C during the 120 min of heating, compared to the monolithic specimen, which reached the critical temperature of 300 degrees C at 105 min. The crack patterns and failure modes of monolithic and precast concrete nib specimens at high temperatures were more visible than at ambient temperature. Based on the ductility factor and Monforton's fixity factor, the concrete nib specimen at high temperatures was categorized as structures with limited ductility and classified in Zone I (pin connection), respectively. This study concluded that external precast concrete nib beam-to-column connections were more vulnerable at high temperatures than monolithic connections.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abd Rahman A. B., 2006, P 6 AS PAC STRUCT EN, pA281
[2]  
Alkhrdaji T., 2003, Strength Evaluation of Existing Concrete Buildings
[3]  
American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM E119, 1992, ASTM - Am. Soc. Test. Mater, V552, P36
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 83411999 ISO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, STANDARD SPECIFICATI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, E2307 ASTM, P1, DOI DOI 10.1520/E2546-07.2
[7]   Temporary beam-to-column connection for precast concrete frame assembly [J].
Araujo, Daniel de Lima ;
Prado, Lisiane Pereira ;
da Silva, Erlucivania Bueno ;
El Debs, Mounir Khalil .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 171 :529-544
[8]  
BSI, 1988, BS68881988
[9]  
Buchanan AH., 2017, STRUCTURAL DESIGN FI, VSecond Edi, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118700402, 10.1002/9781118700402]
[10]  
CIDB, 2021, Construction 4.0 Strategic Plan (2021-2025).