Dimensions of reading: a study of the beliefs of language and literature preservice teachers

被引:2
作者
Ramirez, Carolina Gonzalez [1 ]
Vasquez, Enzo Pescara [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Fac Filosofia & Educ, Dept Didact & Pract, Inst Literatura & Ciencias Lenguaje, Vina Del Mar, Chile
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
reading; reading habit; teacher education; literature; beliefs;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1284539
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study aims to analyze the beliefs that future Language and Literature teachers hold regarding reading. This work is part of a broader research endeavor focused on the reading habits and practices of teachers in training and their role as prospective mediators since the way in which they perceive reading significantly impacts the mediation processes they undertake in their teaching practices to cultivate readers. To achieve these objectives, a multiple case study is conducted, involving interviews with 1st-year students (n = 15), 3rd-year students (n = 15), and 5th-year students (n = 15) enrolled in Language Pedagogy programs across three universities affiliated with the Chilean Council of Rectors. For data analysis, a content analysis approach is employed, supported by NVivo 12. The findings reveal that beliefs about reading primarily fall into two dimensions: academic and personal, with the former exhibiting clearer definition and characterization. This can be attributed to the influence of the disciplines integrated into their education, namely literature and linguistics. In conclusion, it is imperative to address the social dimension of reading during the initial teacher education program, as this aspect is not emphasized by preservice teachers, despite its pivotal role in shaping their identity as reading mediators within the context of their teaching practice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] How do future teachers describe, analyze and value their reading training?
    Alvarez-Alvarez, Carmen
    Manuel Diego-Mantecon, Jose
    [J]. REVISTA COMPLUTENSE DE EDUCACION, 2019, 30 (04): : 1083 - 1096
  • [2] Asfura Eduardo, 2019, Calidad en la educación, P83, DOI 10.31619/caledu.n50.719
  • [3] Asselin M., 2000, Reading Psychology, V21, P31, DOI 10.1080/027027100278338
  • [4] Becerra R., 2020, Estudios De Linguistica, V53, P419, DOI [10.4067/S0718-09342020000200419, DOI 10.4067/S0718-09342020000200419]
  • [5] CAMBRA M., 2000, Cultura y Educacion, V17/18, P25, DOI [DOI 10.1174/113564000753837179, 10.1174/113564000753837179]
  • [6] Creswell J.W., 2007, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
  • [7] Cuesta C., 2006, Discutir sentidos: la lectura literaria en la escuela
  • [8] Díaz-Díaz M, 2022, OCNOS, V21, DOI 10.18239/ocnos_2022.21.2.2967
  • [9] Dornyei Z., 2007, Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
  • [10] Elche M., 2019, Bordon, V71, P31, DOI [10.13042/Bordon.2019.66083, DOI 10.13042/BORDON.2019.66083]