Potential cognitive and neural benefits of a computerised cognitive training programme based on Structure Learning in healthy adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Liu, Chia-Lun [1 ]
Cheng, Xiaoqin [1 ,2 ]
Choo, Boon Linn [1 ]
Hong, Min [1 ]
Teo, Jia Li [1 ,3 ]
Koo, Wei Ler [1 ]
Tan, Jia Yuan Janet [1 ]
Ubrani, Marisha Barth [1 ]
Suckling, John [4 ]
Gulyas, Balazs [5 ]
Leong, Victoria [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Kourtzi, Zoe [6 ]
Sahakian, Barbara [4 ]
Robbins, Trevor [6 ,7 ]
Chen, Annabel Shen-Hsing [1 ,3 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Ctr Res & Dev Learning CRADLE, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Psychol, Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Social Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, England
[5] Nanyang Technol Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[6] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
[7] Univ Cambridge, Behav & Clin Neurosci Inst, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
[8] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore, Singapore
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Structure learning; Cognitive flexibility; Magnetic resonance imaging; Intervention; Statistical learning; Neuropsychological model of cognitive flexibility; Exploration; Exploitation; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; MAGNETIZATION-TRANSFER; FLEXIBILITY; LIFE; PLASTICITY; DIVERSITY; STUDENTS; UNITY; FLASH; MAPS;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07551-2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundCognitive flexibility refers to the capacity to shift between conceptual representations particularly in response to changes in instruction and feedback. It enables individuals to swiftly adapt to changes in their environment and has significant implications for learning. The present study focuses on investigating changes in cognitive flexibility following an intervention programme-Structure Learning training.MethodsParticipants are pseudo-randomised to either the Training or Control group, while matched on age, sex, intelligence and cognitive flexibility performance. In the Training group, participants undergo around 2 weeks of training (at least 13 sessions) on Structure Learning. In the Control group, participants do not have to undergo any training and are never exposed to the Structure Learning task. The effects of Structure Learning training are investigated at both the behavioural and neural level. We measured covariates that can influence an individual's training performance before the training phase and outcome measures that can potentially show training benefits after the training phase. At the behavioural level, we investigated outcomes in both cognitive and social aspects with a primary focus on executive functions. At the neural level, we employed a multimodality approach and investigated potential changes to functional connectivity patterns, neurometabolite concentration in the frontal brain regions, and brain microstructure and myelination. DiscussionWe reported the development of a novel training programme based on Structure Learning that aims to hone a general learning ability to potentially achieve extensive transfer benefits across various cognitive constructs. Potential transfer benefits can be exhibited through better performance in outcome measures between Training and Control participants, and positive associations between training performance and outcomes after the training in Training participants. Moreover, we attempt to substantiate behavioural findings with evidence of neural changes across different imaging modalities by the Structure Learning training.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 71 条
[31]   Learning to Learn Causal Models [J].
Kemp, Charles ;
Goodman, Noah D. ;
Tenenbaum, Joshua B. .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2010, 34 (07) :1185-1243
[32]  
Kercood S, 2017, J POSTSECOND EDUC DI, V30, P329
[33]   Training transfer between card sorting and false belief understanding: Helping children apply conflicting descriptions [J].
Kloo, D ;
Perner, J .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 74 (06) :1823-1839
[34]  
Konen T., 2016, COGNITIVE TRAINING O, P59, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4_6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42662-4_6]
[35]   Brain Dynamics Underlying Cognitive Flexibility Across the Lifespan [J].
Kupis, Lauren ;
Goodman, Zachary T. ;
Kornfeld, Salome ;
Hoang, Stephanie ;
Romero, Celia ;
Dirks, Bryce ;
Dehoney, Joseph ;
Chang, Catie ;
Spreng, R. Nathan ;
Nomi, Jason S. ;
Uddin, Lucina Q. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2021, 31 (11) :5263-5274
[36]   A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High-Quality Data: Development and Usability Study [J].
Leong, Victoria ;
Raheel, Kausar ;
Sim, Jia Yi ;
Kacker, Kriti ;
Karlaftis, Vasilis M. ;
Vassiliu, Chrysoula ;
Kalaivanan, Kastoori ;
Chen, S. H. Annabel ;
Robbins, Trevor W. ;
Sahakian, Barbara J. ;
Kourtzi, Zoe .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
[37]   Executive functions predict literacy and mathematics achievements: The unique contribution of cognitive flexibility in grades 2, 4, and 6 [J].
Magalhaes, Sofia ;
Carneiro, Luisa ;
Limpo, Teresa ;
Filipe, Marisa .
CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 26 (07) :934-952
[38]   IQ and neuropsychological predictors of academic achievement [J].
Mayes, Susan Dickerson ;
Calhoun, Susan L. ;
Bixler, Edward O. ;
Zimmerman, Dennis N. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 19 (02) :238-241
[39]   Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, 2nd edition (WASI-II) [J].
McCrimmon, Adam W. ;
Smith, Amanda D. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2013, 31 (03) :337-341
[40]   Brain plasticity-based therapeutics [J].
Merzenich, Michael M. ;
Van Vleet, Thomas M. ;
Nahum, Mor .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8