Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT

被引:3
|
作者
Pan, Mingyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Wenqian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Chaozhuang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dong, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Yun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jun [4 ]
Wang, Enmin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, CyberKnife Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Neurosurg Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Clin Med Ctr Neurosurg, Shanghai Key Lab Brain Funct & Restorat & Neural R, 12 Wulumuqi Rd M, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[4] Foshan Chancheng Hosp, Radonc Dept, 3 Sanyou Rd, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Stereotactic radiotherapy; Dosimetry; CyberKnife; HyperArc; Glioblastoma; RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-022-02150-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy are feasible treatment options for single glioblastoma multiforme when combined with conventional radiotherapy or delivered alone. HyperArc (HA), a novel linac-based method with 4 noncoplanar arcs, has been introduced into stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single and multiple metastases. In this study, we compared the dosimetric quality of HyperArc with the well-established CyberKnife (CK) and conventional VMAT methods of SRT for a single, large target.Methods Sixteen patients treated in our center with their clinical CK plans were enrolled, and the linac-based plans were designed in silico. From the aspect of normal tissue protection and treatment efficacy, we compared the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), dose distribution in planning target volume, dose in the normal brain tissue, and mean dose of several organs at risk (OARs). All of the data were evaluated with nonparametric Kruskal?Wallis tests. We further investigated the relationship of the dose distribution with the tumor volume and its location.Results The results showed that with a higher CI (0.94 +/- 0.03) and lower GI (2.57 +/- 0.53), the HA plans generated a lower dose to the OARs and the normal tissue. Meanwhile, the CK plans achieved a higher HI (0.35 +/- 0.10) and generated a higher dose inside the tumor. Although manual VMAT showed slight improvement in dose quality and less monitoring units (2083 +/- 225), HA can save half of the delivery time of CK (37 minutes) on average.Conclusion HA plans have higher conformity and spare OARs with lower normal tissue irradiation, while CK plans achieve a higher mean dose in tumors. HA with 4 arcs is sufficient in dosimetric quality for a single tumor with great convenience in planning and treatment processes compared with conventional VMAT. The tumor size and location are factors to be considered when selecting treatment equipment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dosimetric predictive factors for facial nerve paralysis after cyberknife® stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: A single institution experience of 88 patients
    Gehin, William
    Lassalle, Benoite
    Salleron, Julia
    Anxionnat, Rene
    Peiffert, Didier
    Marchesi, Vincent
    Bernier-Chastagner, Valerie
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 181
  • [32] Effects of Inc parameter on quality of VMAT radiotherapy plans for right breast cancer based on dosimetric study
    Shen, Chong
    Liao, Hailong
    Wang, Qi
    Liu, Hai
    Sun, Xiaonan
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (41) : e40125
  • [33] Breast-Conserving Radiotherapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost-A Dosimetric Comparison of 3DCRT, VMAT and IMRT: Do We Really have a Better Plan?
    Joseph, Bindhu
    Ikkurthi, Vedamanasa
    Farooq, Nisma
    Nithin, K.
    Vijay, C. R.
    Ramesh, C.
    Lokesh, V.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (02)
  • [34] Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for early stage right side breast cancer between three techniques: IMRT, hybrid IMRT and hybrid VMAT
    Bi, Suyan
    Zhu, Rui
    Dai, Zhitao
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [35] Dosimetric comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in total scalp irradiation: a single institutional experience
    Ostheimer, Christian
    Huebsch, Patrick
    Janich, Martin
    Gerlach, Reinhard
    Vordermark, Dirk
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 34 (04): : 313 - 321
  • [36] Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using coplanar VMAT for single small brain metastasis: dosimetric analysis and clinical outcomes
    Lai, Jialu
    Li, An
    Zeng, Xianhu
    Liu, Jia
    Zhou, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [37] Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, coplanar volumetric-modulated arc, therapy, and noncoplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in, glioblastoma: A dosimetric comparison
    Hou, Yong
    Zhang, Yan
    Liu, Zhen
    Yv, Lili
    Liu, Kun
    Tian, Xiufang
    Lv, Yajuan
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 187
  • [38] Dosimetric Comparison of the Radiotherapeutic Plans between Composite and Synchronous Planning Approaches in Consecutive-VMAT for Prostate Radiotherapy
    Durmus, Ismail Faruk
    Okumus, Ayse
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 38 (01): : 75 - 81
  • [39] Dual Arc Volumetric-modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT) of Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas: A Simultaneous Integrated Boost Treatment Plan Comparison with Intensity-modulated Radiotherapies and Single Arc VMAT
    Lee, T. -F.
    Ting, H. -M.
    Chao, R-J.
    Fang, F. -M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (03) : 196 - 207
  • [40] Dosimetric impact of rotational errors on the quality of VMAT-SRS for multiple brain metastases: Comparison between single- and two-isocenter treatment planning techniques
    Prentou, Georgia
    Pappas, Eleftherios P.
    Logothetis, Andreas
    Koutsouveli, Efi
    Pantelis, Evaggelos
    Papagiannis, Panagiotis
    Karaiskos, Pantelis
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (03): : 32 - 44