Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT

被引:3
|
作者
Pan, Mingyuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xu, Wenqian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Chaozhuang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dong, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Yun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jun [4 ]
Wang, Enmin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, CyberKnife Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Neurosurg Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Clin Med Ctr Neurosurg, Shanghai Key Lab Brain Funct & Restorat & Neural R, 12 Wulumuqi Rd M, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[4] Foshan Chancheng Hosp, Radonc Dept, 3 Sanyou Rd, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Stereotactic radiotherapy; Dosimetry; CyberKnife; HyperArc; Glioblastoma; RADIATION-THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-022-02150-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy are feasible treatment options for single glioblastoma multiforme when combined with conventional radiotherapy or delivered alone. HyperArc (HA), a novel linac-based method with 4 noncoplanar arcs, has been introduced into stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single and multiple metastases. In this study, we compared the dosimetric quality of HyperArc with the well-established CyberKnife (CK) and conventional VMAT methods of SRT for a single, large target.Methods Sixteen patients treated in our center with their clinical CK plans were enrolled, and the linac-based plans were designed in silico. From the aspect of normal tissue protection and treatment efficacy, we compared the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), dose distribution in planning target volume, dose in the normal brain tissue, and mean dose of several organs at risk (OARs). All of the data were evaluated with nonparametric Kruskal?Wallis tests. We further investigated the relationship of the dose distribution with the tumor volume and its location.Results The results showed that with a higher CI (0.94 +/- 0.03) and lower GI (2.57 +/- 0.53), the HA plans generated a lower dose to the OARs and the normal tissue. Meanwhile, the CK plans achieved a higher HI (0.35 +/- 0.10) and generated a higher dose inside the tumor. Although manual VMAT showed slight improvement in dose quality and less monitoring units (2083 +/- 225), HA can save half of the delivery time of CK (37 minutes) on average.Conclusion HA plans have higher conformity and spare OARs with lower normal tissue irradiation, while CK plans achieve a higher mean dose in tumors. HA with 4 arcs is sufficient in dosimetric quality for a single tumor with great convenience in planning and treatment processes compared with conventional VMAT. The tumor size and location are factors to be considered when selecting treatment equipment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT
    Mingyuan Pan
    Wenqian Xu
    Lei Sun
    Chaozhuang Wang
    Shengnan Dong
    Yun Guan
    Jun Yang
    Enmin Wang
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison between RapidArc and HyperArc in hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost
    Kim, Jeongho
    Kim, Tae Gyu
    Park, Byungdo
    Kim, Hyunjung
    Song, Yun Gyu
    Lee, Hyoun Wook
    Kim, Young Zoon
    Ji, Jun Ho
    Kim, Seok-Hyun
    Kim, Sung Min
    Lee, Jun Ho
    Kim, Haeyoung
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (02) : 76 - 76
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison of HyperArc and InCise MLC-based CyberKnife plans in treating single and multiple brain metastases
    Zhu, Liying
    Dong, Shengnan
    Sun, Lei
    Xiao, Yixuan
    Zhong, Yihua
    Pan, Mingyuan
    Wang, Yang
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (08):
  • [4] Dosimetric Comparison between the HyperArc and Conventional VMAT in Cervical Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Park, Jeehoon
    Park, Byungdo
    Kim, Jeongho
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (18)
  • [5] Whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampus sparing and simultaneous integrated boost to metastases: A plan quality comparison study between Ethos, HyperArc, VMAT and Tomotherapy
    Akdeniz, Yucel
    Ispir, Burcin
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2024, 49 (03) : 185 - 191
  • [6] Dosimetric Comparison of Brain Sparing Between HyperArc and GammaKnife for Single to Triple Brain Metastases
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Mori, Kanji
    Ohira, Shingo
    Tarutani, Kazuo
    Kanayama, Naoyuki
    Okamura, Ayako
    Konishi, Koji
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2025, 45 (04) : 1631 - 1641
  • [7] Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife
    Zhang, Shuming
    Yang, Ruijie
    Shi, Chengyu
    Li, Jiaqi
    Zhuang, Hongqing
    Tian, Suqing
    Wang, Junjie
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2019, 18 : 1 - 8
  • [8] Dosimetric comparison among cyberknife, helical tomotherapy and VMAT for hypofractionated treatment in localized prostate cancer
    Serra, Marcello
    Ametrano, Gianluca
    Borzillo, Valentina
    Quarto, Maria
    Muto, Matteo
    Di Franco, Rossella
    Federica, Savino
    Loffredo, Filomena
    Paolo, Muto
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (50) : E23574
  • [9] Dosimetric Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastasis in Cyberknife and Helical Tomotherapy
    Kang, Young-nam
    Kay, Chul Seung
    Son, Seok Hyun
    Choi, Byung Ock
    Jung, Ji-Young
    Shin, Hun-Joo
    Kay, Chul Seung
    Son, Seok Hyun
    Kim, Myong Ho
    Seo, Jae-Hyuk
    Lee, Gi Woong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 61 (12) : 2049 - 2053
  • [10] Dosimetric and planning efficiency comparison for lung SBRT: CyberKnife vs VMAT vs knowledge-based VMAT
    Yu, Suhong
    Xu, Huijun
    Sinclair, Asa
    Zhang, Xin
    Langner, Ulrich
    Mak, Kimberley
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (04) : 346 - 351