Party Views on Democratic Backsliding and Differentiated Integration

被引:2
作者
Bellamy, Richard [1 ]
Kroger, Sandra [2 ]
Lorimer, Marta [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Polit Sci, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, European Polit, London, England
关键词
differentiated integration; democratic backsliding; European Union; political parties; democracy; EUROPE; PRAGMATISM; HUNGARY; UNION; RULE;
D O I
10.1177/08883254221096168
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Both political parties and differentiated integration (DI) play an ambivalent role in regard to democratic backsliding. Parties' positioning towards democratic backsliding has not always been straightforward, and DI has been seen as facilitating it. We analyse whether party actors view democratic backsliding as a problematic issue for the EU, if they think DI facilitates it, and how they consider the EU should respond to it. Drawing on thirty-five interviews and a survey of forty-two party actors in seven member states, we show that many do view backsliding as problematic. Moreover, around half worried that DI could facilitate backsliding, though others did not link the two. Finally, almost all considered it legitimate for the EU to address democratic backsliding. Although centre-of-left actors are most likely to worry about democratic backsliding and favour EU intervention, actors across the political spectrum are sceptical about accepting DI in matters pertaining to Article 2.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 583
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]  
Giddens A., 1984, CONSTITUTION SOC, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01173303
[22]  
Ginsburg T., 2018, SAVE CONSTITUTIONAL, P10
[23]  
Halmai G., 2017, 201708 EUI, P12
[24]   Why does the European Right accommodate backsliding states? An analysis of 24 European People's Party votes (2011-2019) [J].
Herman, Lise Esther ;
Hoerner, Julian ;
Lacey, Joseph .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 13 (02) :169-187
[25]   Re-evaluating the post-communist success story: party elite loyalty, citizen mobilization and the erosion of Hungarian democracy [J].
Herman, Lise Esther .
EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 8 (02) :251-284
[26]  
Kelemen RD, 2019, Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies, V21, P59, DOI [10.1017/cel.2019.11, 10.1017/cel.2019.11, DOI 10.1017/CEL.2019.11]
[27]   Is differentiation possible in rule of law? [J].
Kelemen, R. Daniel .
COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2019, 17 (02) :246-260
[28]   Europe's Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe's Democratic Union [J].
Kelemen, R. Daniel .
GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2017, 52 (02) :211-238
[29]   The Europeanisation of interest groups: beyond access, fit and resources [J].
Kroger, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2018, 40 (01) :17-31
[30]   Can understanding undermine explanation? The confused experience of revolution [J].
Kurzman, C .
PHILOSOPHY OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2004, 34 (03) :328-351