Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and efficient in the treatment of surgical biliary disease: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Wiseman, James E. [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [2 ]
Oviedo, Rodolfo J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, 600 N Wolfe St Blalock 655, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, 1295 N Martin,Drachman Hall A232, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, 6550 Fannin St Suite 1501, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical education; Minimal ports; BILE-DUCT INJURY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01410-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple studies have suggested that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is both feasible and safe. However, this approach has failed to gain acceptance outside of clinical trials, leaving adopters of this approach vulnerable to medico-legal scrutiny. We hypothesized that the three-port approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and efficient in experienced hands. All LC (including robotic) cases were performed on patients 18 years and older between November 2018 and March 2020. Operations utilizing three ports were compared to those performed using more than three ports. The primary outcomes measured were total operative time, conversion-to-open rate, and the complication rate. A two-sample test was performed to compare operative times, and a Fisher's exact test was used to compare conversion-to-open and complication rates. Linear regression models were used to account for the effect of confounders. 924 total LCs were performed by 30 surgeons in the study period (71 three-port, 853 four or more ports). The mean operative time was 10 min shorter in the three-port group in comparison (64.1 +/- 1.4 min vs. 74.4 +/- 1.8 min, p < 0.01), despite a threefold higher rate of intraoperative cholangiogram in these cases (23.0% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in either the conversion-to-open rate (1.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.35), or the overall complication rate (7.1% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.82). Operative time for LC performed through three ports was significantly less than those performed through the traditional four port approach, despite utilizing intraoperative cholangiogram nearly three times as often. There was no difference in the conversion-to open rate or complication rate. These results provide considerable evidence that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is comparable to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in operative duration, conversion-to-open rate, and complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: role of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography - a retrospective cohort study
    Jinfeng Zang
    Yin Yuan
    Chi Zhang
    Junye Gao
    BMC Surgery, 16
  • [42] Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: role of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography - a retrospective cohort study
    Zang, Jinfeng
    Yuan, Yin
    Zhang, Chi
    Gao, Junye
    BMC SURGERY, 2016, 16
  • [43] Postoperative Vomiting Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Associated with Intraoperative Fluid Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Hsieh, Chia-Yu
    Poon, Yan-Yuen
    Ke, Ting-Yu
    Chiang, Min-Hsien
    Li, Yan-Yi
    Tsai, Peng-Neng
    Wu, Shao-Chun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (10)
  • [44] Reducing Postoperative Opioids in Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study
    Marlor, Derek R.
    Edmundson, Elizabeth
    Cruz-Centeno, Nelimar
    Stewart, Shai
    Fader, Jordan P.
    Lee, Jieun
    Senna, Jack C.
    Oyetunji, Tolulope A.
    St.Peter, Shawn D.
    Fraser, Jason D.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 306 : 580 - 587
  • [45] The impact of dementia on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis: A retrospective study
    Ninomiya, Shigeo
    Amano, Shota
    Ogawa, Tadashi
    Ueda, Yoshitake
    Shiraishi, Norio
    Inomata, Masafumi
    Shimoda, Katsuhiro
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2020, 13 (03) : 351 - 358
  • [46] Prospective Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Outcome of Standard 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Gallstone Disease
    Krishna, Asuri
    Bansal, Virinder Kumar
    Gupta, Siddharth
    Misra, M. C.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 82 (04) : 616 - 624
  • [47] Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A retrospective cohort study of 52 consecutive patients
    Sato, Norihiro
    Kohi, Shiro
    Tamura, Toshihisa
    Minagawa, Noritaka
    Shibao, Kazunori
    Higure, Aiichiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 17 : 48 - 53
  • [48] Prospective Randomized Controlled Study to Compare the Outcome of Standard 4-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Gallstone Disease
    Asuri Krishna
    Virinder Kumar Bansal
    Siddharth Gupta
    M. C. Misra
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2020, 82 : 616 - 624
  • [49] Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Emergent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis Between Attending Surgeons and Residents: A Retrospective Study in Single Medical Center
    Tu, Ching-Wei
    Sun, Ding-Ping
    Ong, Khaa-Hoo
    Chen, Jie-Pu
    Ho, Chung-Han
    Lu, Chih-Ying
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, : 286 - 293
  • [50] The safety of telemedicine clinics as an alternative to in-person preoperative assessment for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with benign gallbladder disease: a retrospective cohort study
    Tomas Urbonas
    Adil Siraj Lakha
    Emily King
    Sophia Pepes
    Carlo Ceresa
    Venkatesha Udupa
    Zahir Soonawalla
    Michael A Silva
    Alex Gordon-Weeks
    Srikanth Reddy
    Patient Safety in Surgery, 17