Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and efficient in the treatment of surgical biliary disease: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Wiseman, James E. [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [2 ]
Oviedo, Rodolfo J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, 600 N Wolfe St Blalock 655, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, 1295 N Martin,Drachman Hall A232, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, 6550 Fannin St Suite 1501, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical education; Minimal ports; BILE-DUCT INJURY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01410-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple studies have suggested that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is both feasible and safe. However, this approach has failed to gain acceptance outside of clinical trials, leaving adopters of this approach vulnerable to medico-legal scrutiny. We hypothesized that the three-port approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and efficient in experienced hands. All LC (including robotic) cases were performed on patients 18 years and older between November 2018 and March 2020. Operations utilizing three ports were compared to those performed using more than three ports. The primary outcomes measured were total operative time, conversion-to-open rate, and the complication rate. A two-sample test was performed to compare operative times, and a Fisher's exact test was used to compare conversion-to-open and complication rates. Linear regression models were used to account for the effect of confounders. 924 total LCs were performed by 30 surgeons in the study period (71 three-port, 853 four or more ports). The mean operative time was 10 min shorter in the three-port group in comparison (64.1 +/- 1.4 min vs. 74.4 +/- 1.8 min, p < 0.01), despite a threefold higher rate of intraoperative cholangiogram in these cases (23.0% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in either the conversion-to-open rate (1.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.35), or the overall complication rate (7.1% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.82). Operative time for LC performed through three ports was significantly less than those performed through the traditional four port approach, despite utilizing intraoperative cholangiogram nearly three times as often. There was no difference in the conversion-to open rate or complication rate. These results provide considerable evidence that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is comparable to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in operative duration, conversion-to-open rate, and complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is Specialisation Needed in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 5122 Patients
    Hussain, Abdulzahra
    Lafaurie, Guillaume
    Hafeez, Rhehana
    El-Hasani, Shamsi
    CHIRURGIA, 2020, 115 (06) : 756 - 766
  • [32] Open Cholecystectomy Has a Place in the Laparoscopic Era: a Retrospective Cohort Study
    Ayman El Nakeeb
    Youssef Mahdy
    Aly Salem
    Mohamed El Sorogy
    Ahmed Abd El Rafea
    Mohamed El Dosoky
    Rami Said
    Mohamed Abd Ellatif
    Mohamed M. A. Alsayed
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2017, 79 : 437 - 443
  • [33] Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Haomin Lin
    Jinchang Zhang
    Xujia Li
    Yuanquan Li
    Song Su
    Updates in Surgery, 2023, 75 : 41 - 51
  • [34] Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study
    Manzia, Tommaso Maria
    Quaranta, Claudia
    Filingeri, Vincenzino
    Toti, Luca
    Anselmo, Alessandro
    Tariciotti, Laura
    De Carolis, Gerardo
    Cacciola, Roberto
    Di Lorenzo, Nicola
    Sorge, Roberto
    Angelico, Roberta
    Monteleone, Giovanni
    Tisone, Giuseppe
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 55 : 56 - 61
  • [35] Comparative outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic, mini-laparoscopic, four-port laparoscopic, three-port laparoscopic, and single-incision robotic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Lin, Haomin
    Zhang, Jinchang
    Li, Xujia
    Li, Yuanquan
    Su, Song
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [36] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study
    Trejo-Avila, Mario
    Solorzano-Vicuna, Danilo
    Garcia-Corral, Ricardo
    Bada-Yllan, Orlando
    Cuendis-Velazquez, Adolfo
    Delano-Alonso, Roberto
    Herrera-Esquivel, Jesus
    Valenzuela-Salazar, Carlos
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2019, 71 (04) : 669 - 675
  • [37] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study
    Mario Trejo-Ávila
    Danilo Solórzano-Vicuña
    Ricardo García-Corral
    Orlando Bada-Yllán
    Adolfo Cuendis-Velázquez
    Roberto Delano-Alonso
    Jesus Herrera-Esquivel
    Carlos Valenzuela-Salazar
    Updates in Surgery, 2019, 71 : 669 - 675
  • [38] Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study
    Hamad, Mostafa A.
    Nada, Ahmad A.
    Abdel-Atty, Mohamad Y.
    Kawashti, Ahmad S.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (12): : 3747 - 3751
  • [39] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective Cohort study
    Demetriou, George
    Wanigasooriya, Kasun
    Elmaradny, Ahmed
    Al-Najjar, Ammar
    Rauf, Mohammad
    Martin-Jones, Alicia
    Aboul-Enein, Mohamed Saad
    Robinson, Steven J.
    Perry, Anthony
    Wadley, Martin S.
    Mourad, Moustafa
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [40] Major biliary complications in 2,714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study
    Mostafa A. Hamad
    Ahmad A. Nada
    Mohamad Y. Abdel-Atty
    Ahmad S. Kawashti
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 3747 - 3751