Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research

被引：298
作者：
Hiebl, Martin R. W. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Siegen, Chair Management Accounting & Control, Unteres Schloss 3, D-57072 Siegen, Germany
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Management Control & Consulting, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
来源：
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS | 2023年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词：
literature review; systematic review; sample selection; articles; databases; search; STRATEGY-AS-PRACTICE; RHETORICAL ANALYSIS; DATABASE SELECTION; JOURNAL RANKINGS; PAST RESEARCH; FUTURE; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE; SCIENCE;
D O I：
10.1177/1094428120986851
中图分类号：
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号：
040203 ;
摘要：
Systematic review techniques are about to become the "new normal" in reviews of management research. However, there is not yet much advice on how to organize the sample selection process as part of such reviews. This article addresses this void and analyzes this vital part of systematic reviews in more detail. In particular, it offers a critical review of systematic literature reviews published in the Academy of Management Annals and the International Journal of Management Reviews between 2004 and 2018. Based on this methodological literature review, the article presents issues to consider in the most critical choices during the sample selection process. Furthermore, this review identifies several descriptive features such as the mean number of research items included in systematic reviews, the mean number of databases used, and the mean coverage period of such reviews. These numbers may be used as benchmark figures in future reviews.
引用
收藏
页码：229 / 261
页数：33
相关论文
共 126 条
[1]   Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies [J].
Adams, Richard J. ;
Smart, Palie ;
Huff, Anne Sigismund .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (04) :432-454
[2]   Best-Practice Recommendations for Producers, Evaluators, and Users of Methodological Literature Reviews [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Ramani, Ravi S. ;
Alabduljader, Nawaf .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2023, 26 (01) :46-76
[3]   WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET? ENHANCING METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Ramani, Ravi S. ;
Alabduljader, Nawaf .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) :83-110
[4]   REDIRECTING RESEARCH EFFORTS ON THE DIVERSIFICATION-PERFORMANCE LINKAGE: THE SEARCH FOR SYNERGY [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Novelli, Elena .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2017, 11 (01) :342-390
[5]   A self-motives perspective on feedback-seeking behavior: Linking organizational behavior and social psychology research [J].
Anseel, Frederik ;
Lievens, Filip ;
Levy, Paul E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2007, 9 (03) :211-236
[6]   Individual-level Foci of Identification at Work: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J].
Atewologun, Doyin ;
Kutzer, Roxanne ;
Doldor, Elena ;
Anderson, Deirdre ;
Sealy, Ruth .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2017, 19 (03) :273-295
[7]   Revealed or Concealed? Transparency of Procedures, Decisions, and Judgment Calls in Meta-Analyses [J].
Aytug, Zeynep G. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. ;
Zhou, Wencang ;
Kern, Mary C. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 15 (01) :103-133
[8]   Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda [J].
Bakker, Rene M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (04) :466-486
[9]   Citations to the "Introduction to informetrics" indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 82 (03) :495-506
[10]   VALUING MULTIPLE TRAJECTORIES OF KNOWLEDGE: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND AGENDA FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
Barley, William C. ;
Treem, Jeffrey W. ;
Kuhn, Timothy .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) :278-317
12345678910