Screening Through Investment: Evidence from the Chinese Automobile Industry

被引:0
作者
Lin, Wei [1 ]
Mathewson, Frank [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Junji [4 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Inst Econ & Social Res, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Econ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Rotman Sch Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Lingnan Univ, Dept Econ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Vertical restraints; Dealer investment; Screening mechanism; Chinese automobile industry; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; FIRM SIZE; VERTICAL INTEGRATION; CREDIBLE COMMITMENTS; PRODUCT LINE; EVOLUTION; ENTRY; QUALITY; GROWTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11151-024-09949-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a competition theory to explain the role of automobile dealers' investment in a vertical contract with manufacturers. Dealer contracts specify manufacturer-suggested retail prices and elements of dealer quality. Dealer quality investments require minimum financial capital where manufacturers impose these limits on dealers. The required dealer investment screens for qualified dealers and incentivizes the desired dealer quality. The prediction is that promotional services, prices, and gross returns are greater for high-quality brands than that for standard-quality brands. To test the theory, we collected data on auto dealers in China in June 2015 for an empirical analysis. Our findings support these predictions: Dealer investment (registered capital) is positively correlated with brand average product prices. In addition, the registered capital is higher when the aggregate demand is greater since high demand increases returns, which induces dealers to increase their investment.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 513
页数:43
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Audretsch, DB .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 49 (01) :21-43
[2]   On the evolution of firm size distributions [J].
Angelini, Paolo ;
Generale, Andrea .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01) :426-438
[3]   EQUILIBRIUM INCENTIVES FOR EXCLUSIVE DEALING IN A DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS OLIGOPOLY [J].
BESANKO, D ;
PERRY, MK .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1993, 24 (04) :646-667
[4]   OPTIMAL RETAIL CONTRACTS WITH ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION AND MORAL HAZARD [J].
BLAIR, BF ;
LEWIS, TR .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 25 (02) :284-296
[5]  
Bouwens J., 2015, PRINCIPALS THEIR CAR
[6]   The better they are, the more they give: Trade promotions of consumer durables [J].
Bruce, N ;
Desai, PS ;
Staelin, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (01) :54-66
[7]   On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory [J].
Cabral, LMB ;
Mata, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1075-1090
[8]   SIGNALING QUALITY BY SELLING THROUGH A REPUTABLE RETAILER - AN EXAMPLE OF RENTING THE REPUTATION OF ANOTHER AGENT [J].
CHU, WJ ;
CHU, W .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1994, 13 (02) :177-189
[9]   Courts [J].
Djankov, S ;
La Porta, R ;
Lopez-de-Silanes, F ;
Shleifer, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (02) :453-517
[10]   TESTS OF ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF FIRM GROWTH [J].
EVANS, DS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1987, 95 (04) :657-674