Exploring the Variability of Human Factors and Usability Testing Methods for Evaluating Medical Devices - Preliminary Results

被引:0
|
作者
Kimalel, Ozelle [1 ]
Magee, Justin D. M. [1 ]
Boyd, Kyle [1 ]
Bond, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, ECCE 2023: Responsible Technology Community, Culture, and Sustainability | 2023年
关键词
UX research methods; Usability testing; Human factors; Medical devices; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1145/3605655.3605788
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The success of a medical device is based on its ability to be deployed according to its use specification to safely achieve the intended outcome. Central to this is the design of the device which, if poorly executed, contributes to 'use error' which affects the efficacy, safety, and user experience of a medical device. Human factors guidance provides recommendations to evaluate the user experience in a bid to improve design efforts and ultimately the safety and usability of medical devices. The heterogeneity of the industry means that the interpretation of these guidelines is subjective and adapted differently to suit the use specification of the devices. The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions of medical device industry professionals on factors influencing the evaluation of the user experience in the design of medical devices. A bespoke survey approach is currently being undertaken to achieve this objective and to interrogate the key issues. There is a lack of substantial evidence in the literature that indicates which user experience testing methods are most favoured and widely used in practice, across all stages of device development from concept to post-sales testing. This study is designed to shed light on industry practices; the variability of user experience testing methods of medical devices, as well as the preferred methods, and the aspects of user experience considered in medical device design.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin prefilled pen: results of patient and nurse human factors usability testing
    Saunders, Helen
    Schertz, Joan C.
    Hecker, Clara
    Lang, Barbara
    Arriagada, Pablo
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2012, 9 (08) : 893 - 900
  • [2] The redesigned follitropin alfa pen injector: results of the patient and nurse human factors usability testing
    Schertz, Joan C.
    Saunders, Helen
    Hecker, Clara
    Lang, Barbara
    Arriagada, Pablo
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2011, 8 (09) : 1111 - 1120
  • [3] Human Factors: Should Your Medical Devices Require Intensive Care?
    Hyman, William A.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 22 (02) : 233 - +
  • [4] Testing methods for MR safety and compatibility of medical devices
    Schaefers, G
    Melzer, A
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2006, 15 (02) : 71 - 75
  • [5] Industrial design and human factors: Design synergy for medical devices
    Kossack, Merrick
    Gellatly, Andrew
    Jandrisits, Alice
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, PT 4, PROCEEDINGS: HCI APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, 2007, 4553 : 489 - +
  • [6] Evaluating Medical Devices Remotely: Current Methods and Potential Innovations
    McLaughlin, Anne Collins
    DeLucia, Patricia R.
    Drews, Frank A.
    Vaughn-Cooke, Monifa
    Kumar, Anil
    Nesbitt, Robert R.
    Cluff, Kevin
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2020, 62 (07) : 1041 - 1060
  • [7] Role of Human Factors / Usability Engineering in Medical Device Design
    Hegde, Vaishali
    59TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS), 2013,
  • [8] Human Factors in Medical Device Design Methods, Principles, and Guidelines
    Branaghan, Russell J.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 30 (02) : 225 - +
  • [9] Human-centered risk management for medical devices - new methods and tools
    Janss, Armin
    Plogmann, Simon
    Radermacher, Klaus
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2016, 61 (02): : 165 - 181
  • [10] Exploring two methods of usability testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols
    van den Haak, MJ
    de Jong, MDT
    IPCC 2003 PROCEEDINGS, THE SHAPE OF KNOWLEDGE, 2003, : 285 - 287