Happiness or trouble? Employee stock ownership plans and employee well-being in new ventures

被引:1
作者
Zhou, Qi [1 ]
He, Sihan [2 ]
Zhu, Renhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Marxism, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Business, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
New venture employee; Employee ownership; Employee well-being; HR practices; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MEDIATING ROLE; MOTIVATION; WORK; ATTITUDES; AUTONOMY; BEHAVIOR; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-023-05437-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is a much lively debate about whether new ventures should adopt employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs). The inconsistent findings may be due to the neglect of employees' life quality. This paper analyzed the relationship between ESOPs and employee workplace-psychology-life well-being and the moderating effect of opportunity-enhancing human resource practices (OHRPs). It adopted a survey that was completed by 262 employees of new ventures in the Greater Bay Area of China. The results show that ESOPs had a positive effect on the workplace and psychological well-being, but a negative effect on life well-being, and that this effect was mediated by psychological ownership. OHRPs moderated the mediating effect of ESOPs on workplace and life well-being via psychological ownership. The results reveal a particular correlation pattern between new venture ESOPs and employee well-being, which helps address the debate about the effects of ESOPs by providing an explanation from the life aspect. These findings highlight the importance of considering employee life well-being in understanding new venture ESOPs.
引用
收藏
页码:14470 / 14484
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]   The more the better ... or is it? The contradictory effects of HR practices on knowledge-sharing motivation and behaviour [J].
Andreeva, Tatiana ;
Sergeeva, Anastasia .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 26 (02) :151-171
[3]  
[Anonymous], OWNERSHIP GOVERNANCE
[4]   Exploring the Process of Ethical Leadership: The Mediating Role of Employee Voice and Psychological Ownership [J].
Avey, James B. ;
Wernsing, Tara S. ;
Palanski, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 107 (01) :21-34
[5]   Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes [J].
Avey, James B. ;
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Crossley, Craig D. ;
Luthans, Fred .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 30 (02) :173-191
[6]  
Bakker AB., 2007, J MANAGERIAL PSYCHOL, V22, P309, DOI [DOI 10.1108/02683940710733115, 10.1108/02683940710733115]
[7]   Exploring the influence of the family upon firm performance: Does strategic behaviour matter? [J].
Basco, Rodrigo .
INTERNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS JOURNAL-RESEARCHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2014, 32 (08) :967-995
[8]   Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth [J].
Batt, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 45 (03) :587-597
[9]   THE CASH FLOW AND INFORMATIONAL EFFECTS OF EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLANS [J].
BEATTY, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 38 (02) :211-240
[10]  
Bernstein Jared., 2016, Employee Ownership, ESOPs, Wealth, and Wages