Surgery or Surveillance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

被引:4
|
作者
Ting, Ying-Che [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Po-Kuei [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hui-Shan [3 ]
Lin, Chih-Hung [4 ]
Chuang, Cheng-Yen [4 ]
Hsu, Han-Shui [1 ,2 ]
Hsu, Chung-Ping [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Hlth Care Adm, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Thorac Surg, Hualien, Taiwan
[6] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Surg, Div Cardiovasc Surg, 707,Sect 3,Chung Yang Rd, Hualien, Taiwan
关键词
Clinical complete response; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Neoadjuvant therapy; Surgery; Surveillance; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; CHEMORADIATION; CANCER; DISEASE; PET;
D O I
10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.04.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We aimed to evaluate the role of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between October 2008 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The criteria for cCR include: (1) tumor resolution on computed tomography, (2) maximum standardized uptake value decrement >35% on positron-emission tomography-computed tomography scan, and (3) a negative endoscopic biopsy result. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients who received surveillance only (surveillance) and those who underwent surgery. A total of 154 patients with cCR, including 54 in the surveillance group and 100 in the surgery group, were included. The 5-year OS rates in the surveillance and surgery groups were 47.9% and 36.9 %, respectively (P= 0.210). The 5-year DFS rates were 38.1% and 28.2%, respectively (P = 0.203). Surgery was not a prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis (OS: HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.69–2.33, P = 0.453; DFS: HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.60–1.96, P = 0.795). In the surgery group, ypT0N0, ypT+Nany, and ypT0N+ were noted in 54%, 37%, and 9% of patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 55.8%, 22.2%, and 12.4%, respectively (P = 0.001). No survival differences were noted between the surveillance and surgery groups. However, 46% of cCR patients in the surgery group did not have pathological complete response, and their outcomes were poor. Esophagectomy may be the only way to identify patients with residual disease. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 614
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative prediction of a pathologic complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Hamai, Yoichi
    Hihara, Jun
    Emi, Manabu
    Furukawa, Takaoki
    Murakami, Yuji
    Nishibuchi, Ikuno
    Nagata, Yasushi
    Ibuki, Yuta
    Yamakita, Ichiko
    Kurokawa, Tomoaki
    Okada, Morihito
    SURGERY, 2018, 164 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [2] Predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Huang, Ren-Wen
    Chao, Yin-Kai
    Wen, Yu-Wen
    Chang, Hsien-Kun
    Tseng, Chen-Kan
    Chan, Sheng-Chieh
    Liu, Yun-Hen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [3] Nomogram for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Liu, Guihong
    Chen, Tao
    Zhang, Xin
    Hu, Binbin
    Yu, Jiayun
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05):
  • [4] Is There a Correlation Between Clinical Complete Response and Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer?
    Liu, Shi-Liang
    Xi, Mian
    Yang, Hong
    Yang, Ya-Di
    Wu, Ying-Jia
    Zhao, Lei
    Zhang, Peng
    Luo, Li-Ling
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) : 273 - 281
  • [5] Residual tumor characteristics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Tang, Han
    Jiang, Dongxian
    Zhang, Shumin
    Zeng, Zhaochong
    Tan, Lijie
    Hou, Yingyong
    Wang, Qun
    Wang, Hao
    Zhu, Jiangyi
    Shen, Yaxing
    Yin, Jun
    Ge, Di
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 162 (06) : 1632 - 1641
  • [6] Predictive Value of Endoscopic Observations and Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Assessing the Pathologic Complete Response of Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Kermani, Ali Taghizadeh
    Ghanbarzadeh, Raha
    Mashhad, Mona Joudi
    Javadinia, Seyed Alireza
    Torghabeh, Ali Emadi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [7] Active surveillance for clinical complete responders after chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    De Pasqual, Carlo A.
    Weindelmayer, Jacopo
    Gervasi, Maria C.
    Torroni, Lorena
    Pavarana, Michele
    Cenzi, Daniela
    Togliani, Thomas
    Rossi, Roberto
    Giacopuzzi, Simone
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111 (02)
  • [8] CT-based radiomic signatures for prediction of pathologic complete response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Yang, Zhining
    He, Binghui
    Zhuang, Xinyu
    Gao, Xiaoying
    Wang, Dandan
    Li, Mei
    Lin, Zhixiong
    Luo, Ren
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2019, 60 (04) : 538 - 545
  • [9] Prognostic role of the pathological status following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Duan, Xiaofeng
    Yue, Jie
    Wang, Shangren
    Zhao, Fangdong
    Zhang, Wencheng
    Qie, Shuo
    Jiang, Hongjing
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [10] TNM Staging Matched-pair Comparison of Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery Alone and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Liu, ShiLiang
    Qiu, Bo
    Luo, GuangYu
    Liang, Ying
    Zheng, YuZhen
    Chen, ZhaoLin
    Luo, KongJia
    Xi, Mian
    Liu, Qing
    Hu, YongHong
    Li, Qun
    Fu, JianHua
    Liu, MengZhong
    Yang, Hong
    Liu, Hui
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 8 (04): : 683 - 690