Maximal respiratory pressures: Measurements at functional residual capacity in individuals with different health conditions using a digital manometer

被引:0
|
作者
Silveira, Bruna M. F. [1 ]
Martins, Henrique R. [2 ]
Ribeiro-Samora, Giane A. [1 ]
Oliveira, Luciano F. [3 ]
Mancuzo, Eliane V. [4 ,5 ]
Velloso, Marcelo [3 ]
Parreira, Veronica F. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Rehabil Sci Program, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Elect Engn Program, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Phys Therapy, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Internal Med, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Lung funct Lab, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Phys Therapy, Ave Antonio Carlos 6627, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Dyspnea; Functional residual capacity; Heart diseases; Lung diseases; Physical therapy; Respiratory muscles; MUSCLE STRENGTH; FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100529
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Measuring maximal respiratory pressure is a widely used method of investigating the strength of inspiratory and expiratory muscles. Objectives: To compare inspiratory pressures obtained at functional residual capacity (FRC) with measures at residual volume (RV), and expiratory pressures obtained at FRC with measures at total lung capacity (TLC) in individuals with different health conditions: post-COVID-19, COPD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), heart failure (CHF), and stroke; and to compare the mean differences between measurements at FRC and RV/TLC among the groups. Methods: Inspiratory and expiratory pressures were obtained randomly at different lung volumes. Mixed factorial analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to compare measurements at different lung volumes within and among groups. Results: Seventy-five individuals were included in the final analyses (15 individuals with each health condition). Maximal inspiratory pressures at FRC were lower than RV [mean difference (95% CI): 11.3 (5.8, 16.8); 8.4 (2.3, 14.5); 11.1 (5.5, 16.7); 12.8 (7.1, 18.4); 8.0 (2.6, 13.4) for COVID-19, COPD, IPF, CHF, and stroke, respectively] and maximal expiratory pressures at FRC were lower than TLC [mean difference (95% CI): 51.9 (37.4, 55.5); 60.9 (44.2, 77.7); 62.9 (48.1, 77.8); 58.0 (43.9, 73.8); 57.2 (42.9, 71.6) for COVID-19, COPD, IPF, CHF, and stroke, respectively]. All mean differences were similar among groups. Conclusion: Although inspiratory and expiratory pressures at FRC were lower than measures obtained at RV/TLC for the five groups of health conditions, the mean differences between measurements at different lung volumes were similar among groups, which raises the discussion about the influence of the viscoelastic properties of the lungs on maximal respiratory pressure. & COPY; 2023 Associacao Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] TrueForce: a new digital manometer to measure maximal respiratory pressures at functional residual capacity
    Pereira M.C.B.
    Silveira B.M.F.
    Pereira H.L.A.
    Parreira V.F.
    Martins H.R.
    Research on Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 37 (02) : 181 - 191
  • [2] Agreement between clinical and non-clinical digital manometer for assessing maximal respiratory pressures in healthy subjects
    Torres-Castro, Rodrigo
    Otto-Yanez, Matias
    Sepulveda-Caceres, Nicolas
    Garrido-Baquedano, Rodrigo
    Barros-Poblete, Marisol
    Vasconcello, Luis
    Puppo, Homero
    Vera-Uribe, Roberto
    Fregonezi, Guilherme
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [3] Agreement between clinical and non-clinical digital manometer for assessing maximal respiratory pressures in healthy subjects
    Torres-Castro, Rodrigo
    Sepulveda-Caceres, Nicolas
    Garrido-Baquedano, Rodrigo
    Barros-Poblete, Marisol
    Otto-Yanez, Matias
    Vasconcello, Luis
    Vera-Uribe, Roberto
    Puppo, Homero
    Fregonezi, Guilherme
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [4] Variations of maximal inspiratory pressure and maximal expiratory pressure from residual functional capacity or total pulmonary capacity and residual volume in normal individuals
    Almeida, Isabela Parra
    Bertucci, Natalia Roldan
    de Lima, Vanessa Pereira
    MUNDO DA SAUDE, 2008, 32 (02): : 176 - 182
  • [5] Influence of a heat and moisture exchanger with a microbiological filter on measurements of maximal respiratory pressures and vital capacity in patients with COPD
    Jaber Lucato, Jeanette Janaina
    Claudino Barbosa, Renata Cleia
    de Almeida Picanco, Patricia Salerno
    Nogueira da Cunha, Thiago Marraccini
    Righetti, Renato Fraga
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA, 2020, 46 (01)
  • [6] MEASUREMENTS OF FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY (FRC) AND MAXIMAL FLOW AT FRC (VMAXFRC) AS DISCRIMINATORS OF NORMAL VS ABNORMAL
    WALL, MA
    MISLEY, MC
    DICKERSON, D
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1983, 127 (04): : 223 - 223
  • [7] The impact of different step changes of inspiratory fraction of oxygen on functional residual capacity measurements using the oxygen washout technique in ventilated patients
    Heinze, Hermann
    Sedemund-Adib, Beate
    Heringlake, Matthias
    Gosch, Ulrich W.
    Gehring, Hartmut
    Eichler, Wolfgang
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (05): : 1491 - 1494
  • [8] CHANGES OF FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE BY DIFFERENT MODES OF VENTILATION - CPPV, IMV, CPAP
    LANGENSTEIN, H
    BRUNNER, J
    WOLFF, G
    SCHWEIZERISCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1983, 113 (33) : 1141 - 1144
  • [9] THE IMPACT OF POSITIVE-END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE AT DIFFERENT INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSURES ON FUNCTIONAL RESIDUAL CAPACITY AND OXYGEN DELIVERY IN A PIG MODEL
    Regli, A.
    Hockings, L.
    Musk, G.
    Roberts, B.
    Noffsinger, B.
    Singh, B.
    van Heerden, P. V.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 35 : 227 - 227
  • [10] Measurements of regional strain and time constants in ex-vivo animal models at different PEEP levels using functional respiratory imaging (FRI)
    Ferreira, Francisca
    Henderson, W. R.
    Van Holsbeke, Cedric
    Vos, Wim
    De Backer, Jan
    Molgat-Seon, Yannick
    Kirby, Miranda
    Dominelli, Paolo
    Griesdale, Donald
    Sekhon, MyPinder
    Coxson, Harvey
    Mayo, John
    Sheel, William
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46