The unintended consequences of no blame ideology for incident investigation in the US construction industry

被引:3
作者
Sherratt, Fred [1 ]
Thallapureddy, Sreeja [1 ]
Bhandari, Siddharth [1 ]
Hansen, Hayley [1 ]
Harch, Dylan [1 ]
Hallowell, Matthew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Construction Safety Res Alliance, UCB 428, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Blame; No blame; Incident investigation; Just culture; Workers; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SAFETY; DISCOURSES; ACCIDENTS; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106247
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A 'no blame' approach within incident investigations is common practice across many industries. It seeks to optimize worker engagement with the process, enhancing information collection and subsequent organizational learning from any incidents that do occur. Workers are assured they will not be blamed for accidents when they swiftly report and fully comply with investigations. A no blame ideology has been widely adopted across the US construction industry, yet it can bring unintended consequences to aspects of the investigative process that, ironically, can also limit organizational learning. Discourse analysis of n = 34 empirical incident investigation simulated interview transcripts, carried out with construction safety experts in an experimental setting, revealed a discourse we termed 'new blame' that detrimentally influenced and shaped investigation interviews. The discourse renders interviewers reluctant to unpack the people in the process, and instead directs focus on things easily blamed without consequence, such as inanimate objects, organizational procedures, or paperwork. Yet without understanding of how workers interact with their work, and what went wrong this time, learning is inevitably limited. At its most extreme, 'new blame' takes incident investigation back to 'Acts of God'; people absolved from any and all responsibility. As no blame is likely to endure, awareness and acknowledgement of such unintended consequences is essential to ensure 'new blame' is not hindering learning from incidents and thus the enhancement of occupational safety in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Augoustinos M., 2006, Social cognition: An integrated introduction, V2nd
[2]   The analysis and management of unsafe acts and unsafe conditions. Data collection and analysis [J].
Baldissone, Gabriele ;
Comberti, Lorenzo ;
Bosca, Serena ;
Mure, Salvina .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 119 :240-251
[3]  
Bornstein B.H., 2005, FLA STATE UNIV LAW R, V32, P443
[4]  
Burr V., 2015, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONI, V3rd, DOI 10.4324/9781315715421
[5]   Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety - developing the conceptual framework [J].
Carayon, Pascale ;
Hancock, Peter ;
Leveson, Nancy ;
Noy, Ian ;
Sznelwar, Laerte ;
van Hootegem, Geert .
ERGONOMICS, 2015, 58 (04) :548-564
[6]  
Carsten O, 2011, HANDBOOK OF TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY, P87, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-381984-0.10007-4
[7]   Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites [J].
Choudhry, Rafiq M. ;
Fang, Dongping .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (04) :566-584
[8]  
Conklin T, 2019, 5 PRINCIPLES HOP TRA
[9]  
Conklin T., 2019, 5 PRINCIPLES HUMAN P
[10]   The Emperor has no clothes: A critique of Safety-II [J].
Cooper, M. D. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 152