The Political Economy of Transatlantic Security - A Policy Perspective

被引:0
作者
Becker, Jordan [2 ]
Kuokstyte, Ringaile [1 ]
Kuokstis, Vytautas [3 ]
机构
[1] Gen Jonas Zemaitis Mil Acad Lithuania, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] US Mil Acad West Point, Dept Social Sci, West Point, NY USA
[3] Vilnius Univ, Inst Int Relat & Polit Sci, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
burden Sharing; collective action; NATO; European Union; political economy; EU-NATO RELATIONS; MILITARY EXPENDITURE; DEFENSE; GROWTH; THREAT; GUNS; EXPANSION; DEMAND; MODELS;
D O I
10.1515/ev-2022-0029
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article reviews the broad political economy literature on transatlantic security, while noting applications to the current challenges ranging from burden-sharing to enlargement to NATO/EU relations, all in the context of renewed state-centric threats to allies emanating from Russia in particular. Thinking about the policy practicalities of transatlantic security has interested scholars and practitioners since the early days of the post-WWII international order. The "O" in NATO emerged as an international "organization" in many ways to address the economic challenges posed by a defense investment imbalance, wherein the US assumed the largest share. This collective action problem and the concomitant burden-sharing challenges merit yet another consideration given a deteriorating security environment in Europe and globally. We discuss a variety of influences that shape the ability of the transatlantic community to invest in defense, while also highlighting the role of recent empirical developments, notably, NATO's prospective enlargement and the EU's policy initiatives in the defense field. The discussion lays groundwork for a broader approach to transatlantic security, that is, beyond the canonical understanding of the collective action problem, and stresses a policy perspective that encourages thinking about levers by which burden-sharing arrangements can be adjusted to deal with unfavourable dynamics of defense investment.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 77
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Impact of Islamophobia on the Future of Global Political Economy and Security [J].
Mulyana, Rohmat ;
Sule, Babayo ;
Busro ;
Septiadi, Muhammad Andi ;
Isfani, Muhamad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIETY, 2025, 15 (01) :119-144
[42]   Beyond the "Sinew of War": The Political Economy of Security as a Subfield [J].
Poast, Paul .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 22, 2019, 22 :223-239
[43]   POLITICAL ECONOMY OF TRADE POLICY - INSTITUTIONS, REGULATION, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT [J].
Krpec, Oldrich ;
Hodulak, Vladan .
POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 2012, 60 (01) :20-39
[44]   Transatlantic Economic Relations in a Changing Global Political Economy: Achieving Togetherness but Missing the Bus? [J].
Smith, Michael .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2009, 11 (01) :94-107
[45]   IS Security Policy Violations: A Rational Choice Perspective [J].
Vance, Anthony ;
Siponen, Mikko .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND END USER COMPUTING, 2012, 24 (01) :21-41
[46]   Trading-off or trading-in? A critical political economy perspective of green growth's policy framing [J].
Jackson, James .
GLOBALIZATIONS, 2024, 21 (07) :1309-1329
[47]   AI governance in India - law, policy and political economy [J].
Joshi, Divij .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 10 (03) :328-339
[48]   Policy for Agriculture and Horticulture in Rwanda: A Different Political Economy? [J].
Booth, David ;
Golooba-Mutebi, Frederick .
DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2014, 32 :S173-S198
[49]   The New Political Economy of EU State Aid Policy [J].
Kassim, Hussein ;
Lyons, Bruce .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY COMPETITION & TRADE, 2013, 13 (01) :1-21
[50]   THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PETROLEUM WEALTH: SOME POLICY ALTERNATIVES [J].
Ross, Michael L. .
MIDDLE EAST DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 5 (02)