Probabilistic risk assessment of endocrine disrupting pesticides in Iran

被引:0
作者
Mahdavi, Vahideh [1 ]
Heidari, Ahmad [1 ]
Khaneghah, Amin Mousavi [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Iranian Res Inst Plant Protect, Tehran, Iran
[2] Prof Waclaw Dabrowski Inst Agr & Food Biotechnol, State Res Inst, Dept Fruit & Vegetable Prod Technol, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Azerbaijan State Oil & Ind Univ, Dept Technol Chem, Baku, Azerbaijan
[4] Prof Waclaw Dabrowski Inst Agr & Food Biotechnol, State Res Inst, Dept Fruit & Vegetable Prod Technol, 36 Rakowiecka St, PL-02532 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Endocrine disrupting pesticides; TMDI; non-carcinogenic risk assessment; carcinogenic risk assessment; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ENANTIOMERS; CHEMICALS;
D O I
10.1080/09603123.2023.2199193
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The chronic dietary risk assessment for 34 pesticides suspected of acting as endocrine disrupters in Iran was assessed by comparing TMDI with the Acceptable Daily Intakes (ADI). Of 34 investigated endocrine-disrupting pesticides (EDPs), 6 had TMDI > ADI. In addition, potential non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risk assessments were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. HQ in wheat was 17.40 and 20.29 in adults and children, respectively. Due to dimethoate residue in wheat, HQ was 2.78, and for fenitrothion residue, 3.22. HI was 21.22 for adults and 24.76 for children in wheat, more than 1. Total Carcinogenic risk (TCR) due to EDPs residues was 6.40 x 10(-5) in apples, in citrus fruits 5.97 x 10(-5), 3.33 x 10(-5) in cucumber, 5.30 x 10(-5) in lettuce, in potato was 2.36 x 10(-5), in rice was 1.61 x 10(-5), 1.78 x 10(-5) in tomato, and due to epoxiconazole residues in wheat was 3.18 x 10(-5), more than acceptable limit 1.0 x 10(-6). Therefore, consumers were at significant risk of carcinogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1369
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Balabanic D., 2018, Zdravniski Vestnik, V87, P69
  • [2] Chemical chiral pollution: Impact on the society and science and need of the regulations in the 21st century
    Basheer, Al Arsh
    [J]. CHIRALITY, 2018, 30 (04) : 402 - 406
  • [3] Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators
    Damalas, Christos A.
    Eleftherohorinos, Ilias G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 8 (05) : 1402 - 1419
  • [4] Epa M., 1997, EPA630R97001, P20460
  • [5] An approach to the identification and regulation of endocrine disrupting pesticides
    Ewence, Annette
    Brescia, Susy
    Johnson, Ian
    Rumsby, Paul C.
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 78 : 214 - 220
  • [6] Evidence for the effect of sorption enantioselectivity on the availability of chiral pesticide enantiomers in soil
    Gamiz, Beatriz
    Facenda, Gracia
    Celis, Rafael
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2016, 213 : 966 - 973
  • [7] Dissipation, residues analysis and risk assessment of metconazole in grapes under field conditions using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
    Guo, Wang
    Chen, Yuling
    Jiao, Hui
    Hu, Deyu
    Lu, Ping
    [J]. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2021, 13 (04) : 84 - 97
  • [8] Enantioselective endocrine-disrupting effects of the phenylpyrazole chiral insecticides in vitro and in silico
    Hu, Kunming
    Zhou, Liangliang
    Gao, Yingying
    Lai, Qi
    Shi, Haiyan
    Wang, Minghua
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2020, 252 (252)
  • [9] Kahn LG, 2020, LANCET DIABETES ENDO, V8, P703, DOI 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30129-7
  • [10] The EU endocrine disruptors' regulation and the glyphosate controversy
    Kalofiri, Paraskevi
    Balias, Giorgos
    Tekos, Fotios
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 8 : 1193 - 1199