Plastic bans in India - Addressing the socio-economic and environmental complexities

被引:29
作者
Noklebye, Emmy [1 ]
Adam, Hans Nicolai [1 ]
Roy-Basu, Avanti [2 ]
Bharat, Girija K. [2 ]
Steindal, Eirik Hovland [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Okernveien 94, N-0579 Oslo, Norway
[2] Mu Gamma Consultants, Unit 29,18th Floor,One Horizon Ctr,Golf Course Rd, Gurugram 122003, Haryana, India
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies NORAGR, As, Norway
关键词
Single -use plastic products; plastic pollution; governance; plastic waste management; India; MARINE POLLUTION; IMPACT; BAGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As one of the flagship amendments to the Plastic Waste Management (PWM) Rules, 2021, the pan-Indian ban on a group of single-use plastic products (SUPPs) introduced in mid-2022 provided a departure point towards more progressive plastic waste legislation. The amendments have mostly been welcomed, yet challenges persist to facilitate its implementation, assess potential environmental impacts of alternative materials, and socioeconomic concerns raised by various stakeholders. Considering the recent amendments to the PWM Rules, we critically engage with and highlight key considerations and prevailing challenges with regards to phasing out SUPPs. We argue that to shape sustainable solutions that reduce plastic pollution, uncertainties related to the environmental fate of SUPP alternatives need to be better understood, whilst recognising and accounting for broader socio-economic impacts of SUPP bans, including industry concerns, impacts on socio-economically disadvantaged communities, and the informal recycling sector. A stronger knowledge base on these aspects can mitigate negative social and environmental externalities, including potentially harmful consequences of ambitious plastic pollution reduction measures.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 227
页数:9
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adam H.N., 2022, IKHAPP POLICY BRIEF
[2]   Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with con fi ned waste management structure: A Singapore case study [J].
Ahamed, Ashiq ;
Vallam, Pramodh ;
Iyer, Nikhil Shiva ;
Veksha, Andrei ;
Bobacka, Johan ;
Lisak, Grzegorz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 278
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, From Pollution to Solution: a global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, County Governments Budget Implementation Review Report for the FY 2018/19
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, A precarious environment for the Rohingya refugees
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits
[7]  
Archer D., 2019, Closing the Loop: Innovative Partnerships With Informal Workers to Recover Plastic Waste, in an Inclusive Circular Economy Approach
[8]  
Barde in Be Waste Wise, 2020, INF WAST REC IND
[9]  
Baviskar A, 2018, RETHINKING ENVIRONME, V23
[10]   Ban the (plastic) bag? Explaining variation in the implementation of plastic bag bans in Rwanda, Kenya and Uganda [J].
Behuria, Pritish .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2021, 39 (08) :1791-1808