How does artificial intelligence development affect green technology innovation in China? Evidence from dynamic panel data analysis

被引:35
作者
Yin, Kedong [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Fangfang [1 ]
Huang, Chong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, 7366,East 2nd Ring Rd, Jinan 250014, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Marine Econ & Management, 7366,East 2nd Ring Rd, Jinan 250014, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial intelligence development; Green technology innovation; System GMM; Dynamic panel threshold model; Temporal difference; Spatial heterogeneity; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; GROWTH; SUBSIDIES; INVESTMENT; EFFICIENCY; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-24088-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the global climate problem becomes increasingly serious, the green technology innovation to achieve "carbon peak and carbon neutral" has gradually become the global consensus of major countries, and how the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology affects green technology innovation (GTI) has received a great deal of attention in the field of economics. Therefore, based on China's inter-provincial panel data from 2006 to 2019, the system GMM, dynamic panel threshold model, and quantile regression model were constructed to examine various influences of AI development on GTI under different environmental regulation intensity, research and development (R&D) investment, and institutional environmental threshold conditions. The findings presented that AI development significantly contributes to GTI and GTFP, with an impact coefficient of 0.0122 and 0.0084, and this influence is mainly reflected in the western region of China and is more obvious in the 2006-2012 period. AI development mainly enhances green technological efficiency, and it has dampening effects on green technological progress during the period 2013-2019. Additionally, there are non-linear threshold effects in the relationship between the level of AI development and GTI when environmental regulatory intensity, R&D investment, and institutional environment are in different level intervals. AI development will boost GTI only when the intensity of environmental regulation and institutional environment is above a certain threshold value. However, the AI development represented by industrial robot applications still has no obvious effect on GTI even when the R&D investment exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, the growth effect of AI development on GTI indicates a decreasing nonlinear pattern as the GTI's quantile rises under the condition that R&D investment and institutional environment intensity cross the threshold, while this growth effect increases gradually with the rise of GTI's quantile when the environmental regulation is above the threshold.
引用
收藏
页码:28066 / 28090
页数:25
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Restrepo, Pascual .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (06) :2188-2244
[2]   The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Restrepo, Pascual .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 108 (06) :1488-1542
[3]  
Acemoglu DM, 2018, SSRN J, V68, P99
[4]  
Agrawal A., 2019, INNOVATION POLICY EC, V19, P139, DOI DOI 10.1086/699935
[5]   Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela [J].
Aitken, BJ ;
Harrison, AE .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) :605-618
[6]   Regional diversity and sources of economic growth in China [J].
Arayama, Y ;
Miyoshi, K .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2004, 27 (10) :1583-1607
[7]  
Autor D, 2018, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1
[8]   The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance [J].
Benzidia, Smail ;
Makaoui, Naouel ;
Bentahar, Omar .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 165
[9]  
Bertani F., 2020, Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, V1, P329, DOI [10.1007/s43253-020-00022-3, DOI 10.1007/S43253-020-00022-3]
[10]  
Bessen J, 2019, ECON POLICY, V34, P589