A projected-search interior-point method for nonlinearly constrained optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Gill, Philip E. [1 ]
Zhang, Minxin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Math, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Math, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Nonlinearly constrained optimization; Interior-point methods; Primal-dual methods; Shifted penalty and barrier methods; Projected-search methods; Armijo line search; Augmented Lagrangian methods; SQP ALGORITHM; STABILITY; SNOPT;
D O I
10.1007/s10589-023-00549-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper concerns the formulation and analysis of a new interior-point method for constrained optimization that combines a shifted primal-dual interior-point method with a projected-search method for bound-constrained optimization. The method involves the computation of an approximate Newton direction for a primal-dual penalty-barrier function that incorporates shifts on both the primal and dual variables. Shifts on the dual variables allow the method to be safely "warm started" from a good approximate solution and avoids the possibility of very large solutions of the associated path-following equations. The approximate Newton direction is used in conjunction with a new projected-search line-search algorithm that employs a flexible non-monotone quasi-Armijo line search for the minimization of each penalty-barrier function. Numerical results are presented for a large set of constrained optimization problems. For comparison purposes, results are also given for two primal-dual interior-point methods that do not use projection. The first is a method that shifts both the primal and dual variables. The second is a method that involves shifts on the primal variables only. The results show that the use of both primal and dual shifts in conjunction with projection gives a method that is more robust and requires significantly fewer iterations. In particular, the number of times that the search direction must be computed is substantially reduced. Results from a set of quadratic programming test problems indicate that the method is particularly well-suited to solving the quadratic programming subproblem in a sequential quadratic programming method for nonlinear optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 70
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A projected-search interior-point method for nonlinearly constrained optimization
    Philip E. Gill
    Minxin Zhang
    Computational Optimization and Applications, 2024, 88 : 37 - 70
  • [2] A class of projected-search methods for bound-constrained optimization
    Ferry, Michael W.
    Gill, Philip E.
    Wong, Elizabeth
    Zhang, Minxin
    OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2024, 39 (03): : 459 - 488
  • [3] A weighted logarithmic barrier interior-point method for linearly constrained optimization
    Lamri, Selma
    Merikhi, Bachir
    Achache, Mohamed
    STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI MATHEMATICA, 2021, 66 (04): : 783 - 792
  • [4] Solving quadratically constrained convex optimization problems with an interior-point method
    Meszaros, Csaba
    OPTIMIZATION METHODS & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (03): : 421 - 429
  • [5] A regularized interior-point method for constrained linear least squares
    Dehghani, Mohsen
    Lambe, Andrew
    Orban, Dominique
    INFOR, 2020, 58 (02) : 202 - 224
  • [6] Corrector-Predictor Interior-Point Method With New Search Direction for Semidefinite Optimization
    B. Kheirfam
    Journal of Scientific Computing, 2023, 95
  • [7] Corrector-Predictor Interior-Point Method With New Search Direction for Semidefinite Optimization
    Kheirfam, B.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2023, 95 (01)
  • [8] ON INTERIOR-POINT WARMSTARTS FOR LINEAR AND COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION
    Engau, Alexander
    Anjos, Miguel F.
    Vannelli, Anthony
    SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 20 (04) : 1828 - 1861
  • [9] Inexact interior-point method
    Bellavia, S
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 96 (01) : 109 - 121
  • [10] Inexact Interior-Point Method
    S. Bellavia
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 1998, 96 : 109 - 121