"That's important, but...": How Computer Science Researchers Anticipate Unintended Consequences of Their Research Innovations

被引:9
作者
Do, Kimberly [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Pang, Rock Yuren [2 ]
Jiang, Jiachen [3 ]
Reinecke, Katharina [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Khoury Coll Comp Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Paul G Allen Sch Comp Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Microsoft, Redmond, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2023) | 2023年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Unintended Consequences; Computer Ethics; TECHNOLOGY; ETHICS; AI;
D O I
10.1145/3544548.3581347
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Computer science research has led to many breakthrough innovations but has also been scrutinized for enabling technology that has negative, unintended consequences for society. Given the increasing discussions of ethics in the news and among researchers, we interviewed 20 researchers in various CS sub-disciplines to identify whether and how they consider potential unintended consequences of their research innovations. We show that considering unintended consequences is generally seen as important but rarely practiced. Principal barriers are a lack of formal process and strategy as well as the academic practice that prioritizes fast progress and publications. Drawing on these findings, we discuss approaches to support researchers in routinely considering unintended consequences, from bringing diverse perspectives through community participation to increasing incentives to investigate potential consequences. We intend for our work to pave the way for routine explorations of the societal implications of technological innovations before, during, and after the research process.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Transparency, Fairness, Data Protection, Neutrality: Data Management Challenges in the Face of New Regulation
    Abiteboul, Serge
    Stoyanovich, Julia
    [J]. ACM JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION QUALITY, 2019, 11 (03):
  • [2] Adar Eytan., 2018, NEGATIVE POTENTIAL C
  • [3] American Medical Association, 2021, ETH CONS
  • [4] A qualitative study of the implementation of a bioinformatics tool in a biological research laboratory
    Anderson, Nicholas R.
    Ash, Joan S.
    Tarczy-Hornoch, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2007, 76 (11-12) : 821 - 828
  • [5] Artefact Group, 2017, TAR CARDS TECH
  • [6] Ashurst Carolyn, 2022, FAccT '22: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, P2047, DOI 10.1145/3531146.3533780
  • [7] The Ethics of Virtual Reality Interactive Digital Narratives in Cultural Heritage
    Barbara, Jonathan
    Koenitz, Hartmut
    Bakk, Agnes Karolina
    [J]. INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING, ICIDS 2021, 2021, 13138 : 288 - 292
  • [8] Rehumanized Crowdsourcing: A Labeling Framework Addressing Bias and Ethics in Machine Learning
    Barbosa, Nata M.
    Chen, Monchu
    [J]. CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [9] Bardzell S, 2010, CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, P1301
  • [10] Towards a Responsible Innovation Agenda for HCI
    Bates, Oliver
    New, Kathy
    Mitchell-Finnigan, Samantha
    Mauriello, Matthew Louis
    Remy, Christian
    Bendor, Roy
    Mann, Samuel
    Chopra, Simran
    Clear, Adrian K.
    Preist, Chris
    [J]. CHI EA '19 EXTENDED ABSTRACTS: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,