Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS)

被引:7
作者
Kaya, Zulal Torenli [1 ]
Alpay, Emre Han [2 ]
Yeniguc, Serif Turkkal [3 ]
Bilgili, Gamze Ozcurumez [1 ]
机构
[1] Prof Baskent Univ, Tip Fak, Ruh Sagligi Ve Hastaliklari AD, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Mersin Univ, Fen Edebiyat Fak, Psikol Bl, Mersin, Turkiye
[3] Dogu Akdeniz Univ, Fen Edebiyat Fak, Psikol Bl, Gazimagusa, Cyprus
关键词
Mentalization; validity; reliability; TRAIT EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE; PERSONALITY-DISORDER; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; EYES TEST; MIND; SEX; ADOLESCENTS; ATTACHMENT; DEFICITS; EMPATHY;
D O I
10.5080/u25692
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: This study, aims to translate the Mentalization Scale (MentS) into Turkish and investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version.Method: The participants, consisting of 615 (310 female and 305 male) Turkish speaking adults, were asked to complete the MentS and the Emotional Intelligence Feature Scale-Short Form (EIFS) and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI).Results: The factor structure of the scale was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Similar with the original scale, findings demonstrated a three-factor structure, namely, 'the self,' 'others' and 'motivation'. Corrected total score correlations for each item were between 0.28 and 0.52. The MentS score showed positive correlations with the EIFS score (r=0.49; p<0.001); and negative correlations with the BPI score (r=-0.37; p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.84 for the total score, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.79 for MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, respectively.Conclusion: The findings show that the 25-item MentS Turkish form has sufficient psychometric properties. Our data supports the use of the Turkish version of MentS in future studies for assessment of mentalization capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 124
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment [J].
Fraley, RC ;
Waller, NG ;
Brennan, KA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) :350-365
[22]   What is Mentalizing? An Overview [J].
Freeman, Catherine .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 32 (02) :189-201
[23]  
Frith C.D., 1992, COGN NEUROPSYCHOL, DOI [10.4324/9781315785011, DOI 10.4324/9781315785011]
[24]   The measurement of reflective function in adolescents with and without borderline traits [J].
Ha, Carolyn ;
Sharp, Carla ;
Ensink, Karin ;
Fonagy, Peter ;
Cirino, Paul .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2013, 36 (06) :1215-1223
[25]   Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research - Common errors and some comment on improved practice [J].
Henson, Robin K. ;
Roberts, J. Kyle .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 66 (03) :393-416
[26]   Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind [J].
Ibanez, Agustin ;
Huepe, David ;
Gempp, Rene ;
Gutierrez, Virna ;
Rivera-Rei, Alvaro ;
Isabel Toledo, Maria .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2013, 54 (05) :616-621
[27]  
Ickes W., 1997, EMPATHY ACCURACY
[28]   Emotional Intelligence: An Integrative Meta-Analysis and Cascading Model [J].
Joseph, Dana L. ;
Newman, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (01) :54-78
[29]   Are women better mindreaders? Sex differences in neural correlates of mentalizing detected with functional MRI [J].
Krach, Soeren ;
Bluemel, Isabelle ;
Marjoram, Dominic ;
Lataster, Tineke ;
Krabbendam, Lydia ;
Weber, Jochen ;
van Os, Jim ;
Kircher, Tilo .
BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 10
[30]   Development and first results of the borderline personality inventory: A self-report instrument for assessing borderline personality organization [J].
Leichsenring, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1999, 73 (01) :45-63