Co-production of nature's contributions to people: What evidence is out there?

被引:16
作者
Kachler, Jana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Isaac, Roman [4 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [4 ]
Bonn, Aletta [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Felipe-Lucia, Maria R. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecosyst Serv, Leipzig, Germany
[2] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Inst Biodivers, Jena, Germany
[4] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Social Ecol Syst Inst, Luneburg, Germany
[5] Pyrenean Inst Ecol IPE CSIC, Huesca, Spain
关键词
anthropogenic assets; coproduction; ecosystem services; nature's contributions to people; CULTURAL ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; AGROBIODIVERSITY; OPPORTUNITIES; RESILIENCE; LANDSCAPES; CHALLENGES; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.10493
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Nature's contributions to people (NCP) rarely originate from nature alone. Often, only by joining natural capital with forms of anthropogenic capital, NCP emerge benefitting people. Understanding how NCP are co-produced by natural and anthropogenic capitals is needed to inform decision-making on sustainable land-use practices. Through a systematic review of the literature, we compile existing empirical evidence on NCP co-production and how this evidence was arrived at. We identified 237 observations from 25 publications on anthropogenic capital indicators co-producing NCP. The reviewed studies were conducted mainly in cropland and forest ecosystems and at the landscape level. Our results show that most evidence for co-production exists for material NCP, with physical capital and/or human capital as main input. Interestingly, non-material NCP relied mostly on human or social capital only, while material and regulating NCP involved multiple types of anthropogenic capital. Our findings provide guidance for future research on how to explicitly incorporate NCP co-production to analytically assess the relationships between anthropogenic capitals and NCP provision. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1134
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mainstreaming biodiversity and nature's contributions to people in Europe and Central Asia: insights from IPBES to inform the CBD post-2020 agenda
    Sandstrom, Camilla
    Ring, Irene
    Olschewski, Roland
    Simoncini, Riccardo
    Albert, Christian
    Acar, Sevil
    Adeishvili, Malkhaz
    Allard, Christina
    Anker, Yakov
    Arlettaz, Raphael
    Bela, Gyorgyi
    Coscieme, Luca
    Fischer, Anke
    Fuerst, Christine
    Galil, Bella
    Hynes, Stephen
    Kasymov, Ulan
    Marta-Pedroso, Cristina
    Mendes, Ana
    Molau, Ulf
    Pergl, Jan
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2023, 19 (01)
  • [42] The Case for Co-production in Singapore's Mental Healthcare
    Lee, Ying Ying
    Ang, Suying
    Tang, Charmaine
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [43] Understanding the diversity of values of "Nature's contributions to people": insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia
    Christie, Mike
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    Church, Andrew
    Siwicka, Ewa
    Szymonczyk, Pawel
    Sauterel, Jasmin Mena
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (05) : 1267 - 1282
  • [44] Knowledge coproduction to improve assessments of nature's contributions to people
    Vallet, Ameline
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Valdivia-Diaz, Merelyn
    Conde, Yesica Quispe
    Garcia, Gerardina Matencio
    Criales, Alejandrina Ramos
    Huamannahui, Francisca Valverde
    Criales, Santusa Ramos
    Makowski, David
    Lavorel, Sandra
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2023, 37 (06)
  • [45] Nature's contributions to people and the Sustainable Development Goals in Nepal
    Adhikari, Biraj
    Prescott, Graham W.
    Urbach, Davnah
    Chettri, Nakul
    Fischer, Markus
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (09)
  • [46] Natural capitals for nature's contributions to people: the case of Japan
    Kumagai, Junya
    Wakamatsu, Mihoko
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Saito, Osamu
    Yoshida, Takehito
    Yamakita, Takehisa
    Hori, Keiko
    Matsui, Takanori
    Oguro, Michio
    Aiba, Masahiro
    Shibata, Rei
    Nakashizuka, Tohru
    Managi, Shunsuke
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (03) : 919 - 954
  • [47] WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS IN CO-PRODUCTION GROUPS WITH PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY? DILEMMAS OF EXPERTISE AND REPRESENTATION IN CO-DESIGNING EASY READ RESOURCES
    Chinn, D.
    Pelletier, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 734 - 734
  • [48] The development of a prototype measure of the co-production of health in routine consultations for people with long-term conditions
    Realpe, Alba X.
    Wallace, L. M.
    Adams, A. E.
    Kidd, J. M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2015, 98 (12) : 1608 - 1616
  • [49] Why Citizens Engage in Co-Production: A Theoretical Framework and Experimental Evidence
    Lee, Seulki
    Na, Chongmin
    [J]. PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 47 (02) : 419 - 448
  • [50] Subcutaneous electroencephalography monitoring for people with epilepsy and intellectual disability: co-production workshops
    Meinert, Edward
    Milne-Ives, Madison
    Sawyer, Jennifer
    Boardman, Liz
    Mitchell, Sarah
    Mclean, Brendan
    Richardson, Mark
    Shankar, Rohit
    [J]. BJPSYCH OPEN, 2024, 11 (01):