Demand planning for the digital supply chain: How to integrate human judgment and predictive analytics

被引:14
作者
Brau, Rebekah [1 ]
Aloysius, John [2 ]
Siemsen, Enno [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
behavioral experiment; demand planning; digitization; field study; forecasting; human judgment; machine learning; FORECASTING METHODS; ADJUSTMENTS; INFORMATION; VALIDATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1002/joom.1257
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Our research examines how to integrate human judgment and statistical algorithms for demand planning in an increasingly data-driven and automated environment. We use a laboratory experiment combined with a field study to compare existing integration methods with a novel approach: Human-Guided Learning. This new method allows the algorithm to use human judgment to train a model using an iterative linear weighting of human judgment and model predictions. Human-Guided Learning is more accurate vis-a-vis the established integration methods of Judgmental Adjustment, Quantitative Correction of Human Judgment, Forecast Combination, and Judgment as a Model Input. Human-Guided Learning performs similarly to Integrative Judgment Learning, but under certain circumstances, Human-Guided Learning can be more accurate. Our studies demonstrate that the benefit of human judgment for demand planning processes depends on the integration method.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 982
页数:18
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Development and validation of a rule-based time series complexity scoring technique to support design of adaptive forecasting DSS
    Adya, Monica
    Lusk, Edward J.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2016, 83 : 70 - 82
  • [2] Expertise, credibility of system forecasts and integration methods in judgmental demand forecasting
    Alvarado-Valencia, Jorge
    Barrero, Lope H.
    Onkal, Dilek
    Dennerlein, Jack T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2017, 33 (01) : 298 - 313
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1971, Principles of Econometrics
  • [4] Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A review
    Arvan, Meysam
    Fahimnia, Behnam
    Reisi, Mohsen
    Siemsen, Enno
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 86 : 237 - 252
  • [5] Investigating the added value of integrating human judgement into statistical demand forecasting systems
    Baecke, Philippe
    De Baets, Shari
    Vanderheyden, Karlien
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 191 : 85 - 96
  • [6] Baker J., 2021, MAXIMIZING FORECAST, P8
  • [7] DATABASE MODELS AND MANAGERIAL INTUITION - 50-PERCENT MODEL + 50-PERCENT MANAGER
    BLATTBERG, RC
    HOCH, SJ
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (08) : 887 - 899
  • [8] INTERACTION OF JUDGMENTAL AND STATISTICAL FORECASTING METHODS - ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
    BUNN, D
    WRIGHT, G
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (05) : 501 - 518
  • [9] oTree-An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments
    Chen, Daniel L.
    Schonger, Martin
    Wickens, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2016, 9 : 88 - 97
  • [10] RULE-BASED FORECASTING - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN EXPERT SYSTEMS-APPROACH TO COMBINING TIME-SERIES EXTRAPOLATIONS
    COLLOPY, F
    ARMSTRONG, JS
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1992, 38 (10) : 1394 - 1414