Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

被引:17
作者
Xu, Jinxin [1 ]
Yan, Chun [1 ]
Li, Zhe [1 ]
Cao, Yunpeng [1 ]
Duan, Hongbing [1 ]
Ke, Sunkui [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Zhongshan Hosp, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PLUS CHEMOTHERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY; THERAPY; IMMUNOTHERAPY; TRIAL; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-022-12752-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose. This study aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods. Literature focusing on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in resectable ESCC published before June 2022 was retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were further performed. Results. A total of 452 patients from 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. All of the studies explored the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The pooled major pathological response (MPR) rate and pathological complete response (PCR) rate were 58.3% and 32.9%, respectively. The pooled incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were 91.6% and 19.4%, respectively. The pooled R0 resection rate was 92.8%, and the resection rate was 81.1%. Incidence of anastomotic leakage, pulmonary infection, and postoperative hoarseness were 10.7%, 21.3%, and 13.0%, respectively. Compared with 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, patients who received > 2 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy showed higher MPR rate (57.3% vs. 61.1%) and PCR rate (30.6% vs. 37.9%), and the incidence of TRAEs (89.2% vs. 98.9%) tended to be higher. However, no significant difference was found (P > 0.05). Two cycles of neoadjuvant therapy showed higher R0 resection rate and resection rate (R0 resection rate: 96.0% vs. 87.8%, P = 0.02; resection rate: 85.6% vs. 74.7%, P = 0.01). Pembrolizumab- and tislelizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy showed higher MPR rate (72.4% and 72.2%) and PCR rate (41.5 % and 50.0%). Compared with other ICIs, tislelizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy showed lower R0 resection rate (80.5%). The pooled incidence of SAEs for pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy (2.0%) was lower. Camrelizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy showed lower incidence of pulmonary infection (11.5%). Conclusions. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is effective and safe for resectable ESCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1597 / 1613
页数:17
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Epidemiology of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Abnet, Christian C.
    Arnold, Melina
    Wei, Wen-Qiang
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (02) : 360 - 373
  • [2] Long-Term Results of a Randomized Trial of Surgery With or Without Preoperative Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Allum, William H.
    Stenning, Sally P.
    Bancewicz, John
    Clark, Peter I.
    Langley, Ruth E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) : 5062 - 5067
  • [3] A Randomized Trial Comparing Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Versus Preoperative Chemotherapy for Localized Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus (JCOG9907)
    Ando, Nobutoshi
    Kato, Hoichi
    Igaki, Hiroyasu
    Shinoda, Masayuki
    Ozawa, Soji
    Shimizu, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Tsutomu
    Yabusaki, Hiroshi
    Aoyama, Norio
    Kurita, Akira
    Ikeda, Kenichiro
    Kanda, Tatsuo
    Tsujinaka, Toshimasa
    Nakamura, Kenichi
    Fukuda, Haruhiko
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 68 - 74
  • [4] Bancewicz J, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1727
  • [5] Comparing and contrasting predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy and targeted therapy of NSCLC
    Camidge, D. Ross
    Doebele, Robert C.
    Kerr, Keith M.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 16 (06) : 341 - 355
  • [6] Neoadjuvant treatments for locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer: A network meta-analysis
    Chan, Kelvin K. W.
    Saluja, Ronak
    Delos Santos, Keemo
    Lien, Kelly
    Shah, Keya
    Cramarossa, Gemma
    Zhu, Xiaofu
    Wong, Rebecca K. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 143 (02) : 430 - 437
  • [7] Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2007
    Chen, Wan-qing
    Zeng, Hong-mei
    Zheng, Rong-shou
    Zhang, Si-wei
    He, Jie
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [8] Cancer Statistics in China, 2015
    Chen, Wanqing
    Zheng, Rongshou
    Baade, Peter D.
    Zhang, Siwei
    Zeng, Hongmei
    Bray, Freddie
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Yu, Xue Qin
    He, Jie
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (02) : 115 - 132
  • [9] A multicenter single-arm trial of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer (SIN-ICE study)
    Duan, Hongtao
    Wang, Tianhu
    Luo, Zhilin
    Wang, Xiaoyuan
    Liu, Honggang
    Tong, Liping
    Dong, Xiaoping
    Zhang, Yong
    Valmasoni, Michele
    Kidane, Biniam
    Almhanna, Khaldoun
    Wiesel, Ory
    Pang, Sainan
    Ma, Jianqun
    Yan, Xiaolong
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (22)
  • [10] The Interplay of Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy: Harnessing Potential Synergies
    Emens, Leisha A.
    Middleton, Gary
    [J]. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 3 (05) : 436 - 443