A Two-Stage Method for Improving the Decision Quality of Consensus-Driven Three-Way Group Decision-Making

被引:16
作者
Wang, Mingwei [1 ]
Liang, Decui [1 ]
Li, Dengfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS | 2023年 / 53卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consensus reaching process; decision quality; group decision making; three-way decisions; OPTIMIZATION; FUSION;
D O I
10.1109/TSMC.2022.3222026
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In three-way group decision-making based on the minimum risk Bayesian decision theory, the consensus of basic loss function evaluation becomes its main core issue. However, if we only consider evaluation information consensus, it does not ensure the classification quality of three-way decisions. Thus, to balance the consensus and decision quality, we design a three-way group decision-making joint learning process via constructing a two-stage group consensus method. Inspired by supervised learning, Stage 1 establishes the minimum decision error optimization model (MDEOM) to learn the optimal parameters of three-way decisions and calculate decision loss reference values. Then, we design an algorithm to solve MDEOM based on particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. In Stage 2, we calculate adjusted decision losses with the minimum decision loss difference consensus model (MDLDCM), which can guide the consensus adjustment of loss functions and improve the decision quality of three-way group decision making. Finally, some implications of three-way group decision making with the two-stage group consensus method are discussed by a series of experiments which prove the improvement effectiveness of our proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:2770 / 2780
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Two-stage interactive method for group multiple criteria decision making under risk
    Du, Y. (duyuanwei@gmail.com), 2012, Advanced Institute of Convergence Information Technology (04): : 367 - 374
  • [22] A preference-approval structure-based non-additive three-way group consensus decision-making approach for medical diagnosis
    Ye, Jin
    Sun, Bingzhen
    Bai, Juncheng
    Bao, Qiang
    Chu, Xiaoli
    Bao, Kun
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2024, 101
  • [23] Two-Stage Image Classification Method Based on Three-Way Decisions
    Chen C.
    Zhang H.
    Cai K.
    Miao D.
    Moshi Shibie yu Rengong Zhineng/Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 34 (08): : 768 - 776
  • [24] Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making
    Liang, Decui
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Liu, Dun
    Hu, Pei
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2015, 29 : 256 - 269
  • [25] Dual probabilistic linguistic consensus reaching method for group decision-making
    Saha, Abhijit
    Senapati, Tapan
    Akram, Muhammad
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Mesiar, Radko
    Arya, Leena
    GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2024, 9 (02)
  • [26] A Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Method Fusing Three-Way Clustering and Regret Theory Under Fuzzy Preference Relations
    Guo, Lun
    Zhan, Jianming
    Zhang, Chao
    Xu, Zeshui
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2024, 32 (09) : 4846 - 4860
  • [27] Two-stage flexible warranty decision-making considering downtime loss
    Zheng, Rui
    Su, Chun
    Zheng, Yuqiao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2020, 234 (03) : 527 - 535
  • [28] Dual probabilistic linguistic consensus reaching method for group decision-making
    Abhijit Saha
    Tapan Senapati
    Muhammad Akram
    Cengiz Kahraman
    Radko Mesiar
    Leena Arya
    Granular Computing, 2024, 9
  • [29] Weighted three-way conflict analysis in multi-attribute decision-making perspective
    Luo, Jia
    Han, Banghe
    Huang, Biao
    Geng, Shengling
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2024, 674
  • [30] Three-way group decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets
    Liang, Decui
    Liu, Dun
    Kobina, Agbodah
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 345 : 46 - 64