Leading to Common Prosperity: Does Digital Transformation Help Promote Corporate Philanthropy?

被引:0
作者
Hu, Weijia [1 ]
Du, Rui [1 ]
Lin, Yu-En [2 ,3 ]
Liang, Biming [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accounting, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Ctr Quantitat Econ, Changchun, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Ctr Quantitat Econ, 2699 Qianjin St, Changchun 130000, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Digital transformation; corporate philanthropy; China; G32; G34; M14; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; TOP MANAGEMENT; DATA ANALYTICS; PAY; PERFORMANCE; COVERAGE; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1080/1540496X.2024.2324186
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether digital transformation promotes corporate philanthropy in the Chinese context. We find that corporate digital transformation enhances philanthropic giving and internal pay gap negatively moderates the effect. In addition, we validate the potential channels of decision-making and information transmission that digital transformation affects corporate philanthropy. Further testing shows that digital transformation has more positive effects on corporate philanthropy in high-level digitalized or social-trusted regions than in low-level counterparts. This study enriches our understanding of the impact mechanism of digital transformation on corporate philanthropic giving and provides a new theoretical perspective on the process of corporate philanthropy decision-making in the digital era.
引用
收藏
页码:2447 / 2461
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence [J].
Adams, M ;
Hardwick, P .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1998, 35 (05) :641-654
[2]   What Is Different About Digital Strategy? From Quantitative to Qualitative Change [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Puranam, Phanish ;
Zhu, Feng .
STRATEGY SCIENCE, 2019, 4 (04) :253-261
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Academy of Management Review, DOI [10.2307/257850, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296]
[4]   ORGANIZATIONAL THEORIES - SOME CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION [J].
BACHARACH, SB .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :496-515
[5]   Stakeholder preference and strategic corporate social responsibility [J].
Banerjee, Shantanu ;
Homroy, Swarnodeep ;
Slechten, Aurelie .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 77
[6]   Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? [J].
Bizjak, John M. ;
Lemmon, Michael L. ;
Naveen, Lalitha .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (02) :152-168
[7]   Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives [J].
Branco, Manuel Castelo ;
Rodrigues, Lucia Lima .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 69 (02) :111-132
[8]  
Campbell JL, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P946, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684
[9]  
Carroll A.B., 1991, Bus Horiz, V34, P39, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G, 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G, DOI 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.HDL:11323/2358.ISSN0007-6813]
[10]   What do we know about corporate philanthropy? A review and research directions [J].
Cha, Wonsuk ;
Rajadhyaksha, Ujvala .
BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2021, 30 (03) :262-286