Reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer assessed on a 1.5 T MR-Linac and comparison to parallel measurements on a 3 T diagnostic scanner

被引:1
作者
Habrich, Jonas [1 ,9 ]
Boeke, Simon [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fritz, Victor [5 ]
Koerner, Elisa [1 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantin [6 ]
Schick, Fritz [5 ]
Gani, Cihan [4 ]
Zips, Daniel [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Thorwarth, Daniela [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sect Biomed Phys, Tubingen, Germany
[2] German Canc Consortium DKTK, partner site Tubingen, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tubingen, Germany
[5] Univ Tubingen, Sect Expt Radiol, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Univ Tubingen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Berlin, Germany
[8] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Humboldt Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sect Biomed Phys, Hoppe Seyler Str, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
MR guided radiation therapy; Functional imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; MR-Linac; Reproducibility; Apparent diffusion coefficient; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; SALIVARY-GLAND FUNCTION; FIELD-STRENGTH; ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY; COEFFICIENT ADC; B-VALUE; BRAIN; VALUES; REPEATABILITY; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110046
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Before quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) acquired with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for interventional trials in radiotherapy (RT), technical validation of these QIBs is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, derived from diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI, in head and neck cancer using a 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL) by comparison to a 3 T diagnostic scanner (DS). Material and methods: DW-MRIs were acquired on MRL and DS for 15 head and neck cancer patients before RT and in week 2 and rigidly registered to the planning computed tomography. Mean ADC values were calculated for submandibular (SG) and parotid (PG) glands as well as target volumes (TV, gross tumor volume and lymph nodes), which were delineated based on computed tomography. Mean absolute ADC differences as well as within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all volumes of interest. Results: A total of 23 datasets were analyzed. Mean ADC difference (DS-MRL) for SG, PG and TV resulted in 142, 254 and 93 & sdot;10-6 mm2/s. wCVs/ICCs, comparing MRL and DS, were determined as 13.7 %/0.26, 24.4 %/0.23 and 16.1 %/0.73 for SG, PG and TV, respectively. Conclusion: ADC values, measured on the 1.5 T MRL, showed reasonable reproducibility with an ADC underestimation in contrast to the DS. This ADC shift must be validated in further experiments and considered for future translation of QIB candidates from DS to MRL for response adaptive RT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging with conventional MR imaging for differentiating complex solid and cystic ovarian tumors at 1.5T
    Zhang, Ping
    Cui, Yanfen
    Li, Wenhua
    Ren, Gang
    Chu, Caiting
    Wu, Xiangru
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging with conventional MR imaging for differentiating complex solid and cystic ovarian tumors at 1.5T
    Ping Zhang
    Yanfen Cui
    Wenhua Li
    Gang Ren
    Caiting Chu
    Xiangru Wu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 10
  • [23] Quality assurance assessment of intra-acquisition diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging registration and contour propagation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy
    Naser, Mohamed A. A.
    Wahid, Kareem A. A.
    Ahmed, Sara
    Salama, Vivian
    Dede, Cem
    Edwards, Benjamin W. W.
    Lin, Ruitao
    McDonald, Brigid
    Salzillo, Travis C. C.
    He, Renjie
    Ding, Yao
    Abdelaal, Moamen Abobakr
    Thill, Daniel
    O'Connell, Nicolette
    Willcut, Virgil
    Christodouleas, John P. P.
    Lai, Stephen Y. Y.
    Fuller, Clifton D. D.
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (04) : 2089 - 2099
  • [24] Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for assessment of tumor aggressiveness in prostate cancer at 3T
    Fukunaga, Takeshi
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Ueda, Yu
    Miyaji, Yoshiyuki
    Kido, Ayumu
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Sone, Teruki
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 83 : 152 - 159
  • [25] Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer From Postradiation Changes
    Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel
    Gaballa, Gada
    Ashamalla, Germin
    Alashry, Mohamed Saad
    Nada, Nadia
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (06) : 849 - 854
  • [26] A review of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer patients for treatment evaluation and prediction of radiation-induced xerostomia
    Ermongkonchai, Tai
    Khor, Richard
    Wada, Morikatsu
    Lau, Eddie
    Xing, Daniel Tao
    Ng, Sweet Ping
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [27] Endometrial cancer: Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression at 3T
    Seo, Jung Min
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Choi, Dongil
    Park, Byung Kwan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (05) : 1151 - 1159
  • [28] Diagnostic Performances of ADC Value in Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions in 1.5 T: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Winniecia Dkhar
    Rajagopal Kadavigere
    Suresh Sukumar
    Abhimanyu Pradhan
    S Sharath
    Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2023, 43 : 497 - 507
  • [29] Diagnostic Performances of ADC Value in Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions in 1.5 T: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dkhar, Winniecia
    Kadavigere, Rajagopal
    Sukumar, Suresh
    Pradhan, Abhimanyu
    Sharath, S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 43 (05) : 497 - 507
  • [30] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of lung cancer at 3.0 T: a preliminary study on monitoring diffusion changes during chemoradiation therapy
    Chang, Qing
    Wu, Ning
    Ouyang, Han
    Huang, Yao
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (02) : 98 - 103