Liquefaction numerical analysis of cantilevered retaining walls with saturated backfill containing fines content

被引:1
作者
Iraji, Amin [1 ]
Osouli, Abdolreza [2 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Technol, Engn Fac Khoy, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Edwardsville, IL 62026 USA
关键词
Cantilever retaining wall; Saturated backfill; Fines content; Cohesion; Liquefaction; Seismic behavior; GRAVITY QUAY WALLS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11440-023-02181-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Seismic behavior analyses of cantilever retaining walls are affected by saturated backfills. There are records of retaining walls that include fines content in the backfill with up to 95 kPa cohesiveness. The behavior of such backfills is different than clean cohesionless backfills and affects the retaining wall seismic response and liquefaction potential. Due to lack of such well-instrumented sites for analyses of these types of walls during seismic event, this study aims at analyses of such walls using validated numerical analyses. A 3 m- and 9 m-high cantilever retaining wall with saturated backfill was simulated to investigate the seismic response of the wall under 0.25-0.65 g peak ground acceleration (PGA). The probability of liquefaction and its effects were assessed. To validate the numerical procedure, a cantilever retaining wall modeled in a centrifuge test by others was simulated numerically in a previous research by authors and referred briefly herein. The validated numerical model was used to investigate the effect of dirty backfills with 10 kPa and 30 kPa cohesions on lateral displacement, foundation settlement, total seismic active pressure and its point of action, porewater pressure ratio, backfill deformation pattern, potential failure surfaces (PFS), and wall failure mode.
引用
收藏
页码:4457 / 4483
页数:27
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction of a Gravity Quay Wall and the Effect of Densification in Liquefiable Sites
    Abu Taiyab, Md
    Alam, Md Jahangir
    Abedin, Md Zoynul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2014, 14 (01) : 20 - 33
  • [2] Agusti G.C., 2013, Seismic Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures in Cohesive Soils
  • [3] Anderson D.G., 2008, Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments, V611
  • [4] Development of fragility functions for geotechnical constructions: Application to cantilever retaining walls
    Argyroudis, Sotirios
    Kaynia, Amir M.
    Pitilakis, Kyriazis
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2013, 50 : 106 - 116
  • [5] PROJECT VELACS - CONTROL TEST-RESULTS
    ARULANANDAN, K
    SCOTT, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (08): : 1276 - 1292
  • [6] Arulmoli K., 1992, 90 LAB TEST PROGR, V90, P562
  • [7] Finite-Element Study for Seismic Structural and Global Stability of Cantilever-Type Retaining Walls
    Bakr, Junied
    Ahmad, Syed Mohd
    Lombardi, Domenico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2019, 19 (10)
  • [8] Numerical prediction of undrained cyclic triaxial experiments on saturated Kasai river sand using two constitutive models of liquefaction
    Banerjee, Raj
    Chattaraj, Rana
    Parulekar, Y. M.
    Sengupta, Aniruddha
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 80 (11) : 8565 - 8582
  • [9] Biggs J.M., 1964, Introduction to Structural Dynamics
  • [10] Bowles J.E., 1996, FDN ANAL DESIGN, V5th edn