Mandibular condylar fractures: a 5-year retrospective analysis comparing open versus closed reduction

被引:3
作者
Thean, David [1 ,4 ]
Chang, Frank [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Oral Hlth Ctr Western Australia, Oral Surg Dept, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Royal Perth Hosp, Oral & Maxillofacial Dept, 97 Wellington St, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
关键词
condyle; facial nerve; facial trauma; fracture; mandible; RETROMANDIBULAR TRANSPAROTID APPROACH; INTERNAL-FIXATION; SUBCONDYLAR FRACTURES; NERVE INJURIES; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/ans.18705
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMandibular fractures are common facial fractures, and contemporary management of mandibular condylar fractures is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who sustained a mandibular condylar fracture between 2016 and 2020, who were managed by either open or closed techniques. The outcomes of this study were: post-operative facial nerve function, occlusion, and maximal mouth opening.MethodsThis study is a retrospective multicentre cohort study which assessed clinical records for 246 patients with mandibular condyle fractures in three hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. The primary outcome measure was changes in post-operative facial nerve function.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-two patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and 114 patients had closed management. The overall rate of temporary facial nerve injury following ORIF was 3.28%. The overall rate of permanent facial nerve injury was 0.82%. Sialocoele occurred in 2.46% of all patients who underwent ORIF. 6.14% of patients had persisting malocclusion across both groups. There was a statistically significant association between the degree of fragment shortening and facial nerve injury (P = 0.0063), with more facial nerve changes in the group with 5 mm or greater of fragment shortening.ConclusionsThere is still significant debate over the management of mandibular condylar injuries. This study demonstrates a similar rate of temporary and permanent facial nerve injury as previously described, as well as a similar rate of sialocoele occurrence. Further prospective studies may provide clarity about important characteristics that will help guide decision making for mandibular condylar fractures. This study is a retrospective multicentre cohort study which assessed clinical records for 246 patients with mandibular condyle fractures in three hospitals in Perth, Western Australia. The primary outcome measure was changes in post-operative facial nerve function.image
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 603
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Does encountering the facial nerve during surgical management of mandibular condylar process fractures increase the risk of facial nerve weakness? A systematic review and meta-regression analysis [J].
Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed ;
Ellis, Edward ;
Neff, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (08) :1223-1231
[2]   Does the surgical approach for treating mandibular condylar fractures affect the rate of seventh cranial nerve injuries? A systematic review and meta-analysis based on a new classification for surgical approaches [J].
Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed ;
Louvrier, Aurelien ;
Colletti, Giacomo ;
Wolford, Larry M. ;
Biglioli, Federico ;
Ragaey, Marwa ;
Meyer, Christophe ;
Ellis, Edward, III .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (03) :398-412
[3]   Current Concepts in the Mandibular Condyle Fracture Management Part II: Open Reduction Versus Closed Reduction [J].
Choi, Kang-Young ;
Yang, Jung-Dug ;
Chung, Ho-Yun ;
Cho, Byung-Chae .
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2012, 39 (04) :301-308
[4]  
Eckelt U., 1995, Revue de Stomatologie et de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale, V96, P158
[5]   Open versus closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process - a prospective randomized multi-centre study [J].
Eckelt, Uwe ;
Schneider, Matthias ;
Erasmus, Francois ;
Gerlach, Klaus Louis ;
Kuhlisch, Eberhard ;
Loukota, Richard ;
Rasse, Michael ;
Schubert, Johannes ;
Terheyden, Hendrik .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 34 (05) :306-314
[6]   Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures [J].
Ellis, E ;
McFadden, D ;
Simon, P ;
Throckmorton, G .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2000, 58 (09) :950-958
[7]   RIGID FIXATION OF MANDIBULAR CONDYLE FRACTURES [J].
ELLIS, E ;
DEAN, J .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1993, 76 (01) :6-15
[8]   Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures [J].
Haug, RH ;
Assael, LA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (04) :370-375
[9]   The role of open reduction and internal fixation in unilateral fractures of the mandibular condyle: a prospective study [J].
Hyde, N ;
Manisali, M ;
Aghabeigi, B ;
Sneddon, K ;
Newman, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 40 (01) :19-22
[10]   Longitudinal study of risk for facial nerve injury in mandibular condyle fracture surgery: marginal mandibular branch-traversing classification of percutaneous approaches [J].
Imai, Tomoaki ;
Fujita, Yusei ;
Takaoka, Hiroo ;
Motoki, Ayako ;
Kanesaki, Tomohiko ;
Ota, Yoshiyuki ;
Chisoku, Hirohisa ;
Ohmae, Masatoshi ;
Sumi, Tetsuro ;
Nakazawa, Mitsuhiro ;
Uzawa, Narikazu .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (04) :1445-1454