Association of Past and Future Paid Medical Malpractice Claims

被引:2
|
作者
Hyman, David A. [1 ]
Lerner, Joshua [2 ]
Magid, David J. [3 ]
Black, Bernard [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Law, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Chicago, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Publ Hlth, Lafayette, CO USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Pritzker Sch Law, Chicago, IL USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
PHYSICIANS; BAD;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5436
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Many physicians believe that most medical malpractice claims are random events. This study assessed the association of prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future paid claims; whether public disclosure of prior paid claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of 1 or more prior paid medical malpractice claims with future paid claims. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study assessed the association between prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future claims; whether public disclosure of prior claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. This retrospective case-control study included all 881 876 licensed physicians in the US. All data analysis took place between July, 2018 and January, 2023. EXPOSURE Paid medical malpractice claims. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Association between a prior paid medical malpractice claim and likelihood of a paid claim in a future period, compared with simulated results expected if paid claims are random events. Using the same outcomes, we also assessed whether public disclosure of paid claims affects future paid claim rates. RESULTS This study included all 881 876 physicians licensed to practice in the US at the time of the study. Overall, 3.3% of the 841 961 physicians with 0 paid claims in the prior period had 1 or more claims in the future period vs 12.4% of the 34 512 physicians with 1 paid claim in the prior period; 22.4% of the 4189 physicians with 2 paid claims in the prior period; and 37% of the 1214 physicians with 3 paid claims in the prior period. The association between prior claims and future claims was similar for high-medical-malpractice-risk and lower-risk specialties; 1 prior-period claim was associated with a 3.1 times higher likelihood of a future-period claim for high-risk specialties (95% CI, 2.8-3.4) vs a 4.2 times higher likelihood for lower-risk specialties (95% CI, 3.8-4.6). The predictive power of a prior paid claim for future claims declined gradually as the time since the prior claim increased, for prior or future periods up to 10 years. Public disclosure did not affect the association between prior and future paid claims. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study of paid medical malpractice claims for all US physicians, a single prior paid claim was associated with substantial, long-lived higher future claim risk, independent of whether a physician was practicing in a high- or low-risk specialty, or whether a state publicly disclosed paid claims. Timely, noncoercive intervention, including education, has the potential to reduce future claims.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Medical Malpractice and Diagnostic Radiology: Challenges and Opportunities
    Sumner, Christina
    Kietzman, Alexander
    Kadom, Nadja
    Frigini, Alexandre
    Makary, Mina S.
    Martin, Ardenne
    Mcknight, Colin
    Retrouvey, Michele
    Spieler, Bradley
    Griffith, Brent
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (01) : 233 - 241
  • [42] Medical Malpractice Litigation Following Arthroscopic Surgery
    Shah, Kalpit N.
    Eltorai, Adam E. M.
    Perera, Sudheesha
    Durand, Wesley M.
    Shantharam, Govind
    Owens, Brett D.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (07) : 2236 - 2244
  • [43] Catastrophic Medical Malpractice Payouts in the United States
    Bixenstine, Paul J.
    Shore, Andrew D.
    Mehtsun, Winta T.
    Ibrahim, Andrew M.
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    Makary, Martin A.
    JOURNAL FOR HEALTHCARE QUALITY, 2014, 36 (04) : 43 - 53
  • [44] Medical Malpractice Litigation A Fellow's Perspective
    Badri, Marwan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (04) : 418 - 419
  • [45] Aspects of communication regarding medical malpractice suits
    Pilling Janos
    Erdelyi Kamilla
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2016, 157 (17) : 654 - 658
  • [46] Medical Malpractice in Nerve Injury of the Upper Extremity
    Krauss, Emily M.
    Shankar, Vikram
    Patterson, Jennifer Megan Mackinnon
    Mackinnon, Susan E.
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2021, 16 (04): : 425 - 431
  • [47] Medical practice and malpractice litigation in an evolutionary context
    Antoci, Angelo
    Maccioni, Alessandro Fiori
    Russu, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2018, 28 (04) : 915 - 928
  • [48] Courts, scheduled damages, and medical malpractice insurance
    Bertoli, Paola
    Grembi, Veronica
    EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 55 (02) : 831 - 854
  • [49] Surgeon Demographics and Medical Malpractice in Adult Reconstruction
    McGrory, Brian J.
    Bal, B. Sonny
    York, Sally
    Macaulay, William
    McConnell, David B.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (02) : 358 - 366
  • [50] Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Surgical Residents
    Thiels, Cornelius A.
    Choudhry, Asad J.
    Ray-Zack, Mohamed D.
    Lindor, Rachel A.
    Bergquist, John R.
    Habermann, Elizabeth B.
    Zielinski, Martin D.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (01) : 8 - 13