Association of Past and Future Paid Medical Malpractice Claims

被引:2
|
作者
Hyman, David A. [1 ]
Lerner, Joshua [2 ]
Magid, David J. [3 ]
Black, Bernard [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Law, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Chicago, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Publ Hlth, Lafayette, CO USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Pritzker Sch Law, Chicago, IL USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
PHYSICIANS; BAD;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5436
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Many physicians believe that most medical malpractice claims are random events. This study assessed the association of prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future paid claims; whether public disclosure of prior paid claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of 1 or more prior paid medical malpractice claims with future paid claims. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study assessed the association between prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future claims; whether public disclosure of prior claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. This retrospective case-control study included all 881 876 licensed physicians in the US. All data analysis took place between July, 2018 and January, 2023. EXPOSURE Paid medical malpractice claims. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Association between a prior paid medical malpractice claim and likelihood of a paid claim in a future period, compared with simulated results expected if paid claims are random events. Using the same outcomes, we also assessed whether public disclosure of paid claims affects future paid claim rates. RESULTS This study included all 881 876 physicians licensed to practice in the US at the time of the study. Overall, 3.3% of the 841 961 physicians with 0 paid claims in the prior period had 1 or more claims in the future period vs 12.4% of the 34 512 physicians with 1 paid claim in the prior period; 22.4% of the 4189 physicians with 2 paid claims in the prior period; and 37% of the 1214 physicians with 3 paid claims in the prior period. The association between prior claims and future claims was similar for high-medical-malpractice-risk and lower-risk specialties; 1 prior-period claim was associated with a 3.1 times higher likelihood of a future-period claim for high-risk specialties (95% CI, 2.8-3.4) vs a 4.2 times higher likelihood for lower-risk specialties (95% CI, 3.8-4.6). The predictive power of a prior paid claim for future claims declined gradually as the time since the prior claim increased, for prior or future periods up to 10 years. Public disclosure did not affect the association between prior and future paid claims. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study of paid medical malpractice claims for all US physicians, a single prior paid claim was associated with substantial, long-lived higher future claim risk, independent of whether a physician was practicing in a high- or low-risk specialty, or whether a state publicly disclosed paid claims. Timely, noncoercive intervention, including education, has the potential to reduce future claims.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN PATIENT SAFETY INDICATORS AND MEDICAL MALPRACTICE RISK: EVIDENCE FROM FLORIDA AND TEXAS
    Black, Bernard S.
    Wagner, Amy R.
    Zabinski, Zenon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 3 (02) : 109 - 139
  • [32] Medical Malpractice The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
    Loughlin, Kevin R.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 36 (01) : 101 - +
  • [33] Medical Malpractice Epidemiology Adults and Pediatrics
    Heidepriem, Kelly Wong
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 43 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [34] The welfare effects of medical malpractice liability
    Lakdawalla, Darius N.
    Seabury, Seth A.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2012, 32 (04) : 356 - 369
  • [35] A New Legal Standard for Medical Malpractice
    Aaron, Daniel G.
    Robertson, Christopher T.
    King, Louise P.
    Sage, William M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025, 333 (13): : 1161 - 1165
  • [36] The Role of Apology Laws in Medical Malpractice
    Ross, Nina E.
    Newman, William J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2021, 49 (03) : 406 - 414
  • [37] Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: A Comprehensive Analysis
    Thomas, Ranjit
    Gupta, Raghav
    Griessenauer, Christoph J.
    Moore, Justin M.
    Adeeb, Nimer
    Motiei-Langroudi, Rouzbeh
    Guidal, Bryan
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Alterman, Ron L.
    Friedlander, Robert M.
    Ogilvy, Christopher S.
    Thomas, Ajith J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 110 : E552 - E559
  • [38] The Current State of Medical Malpractice in Urology
    Sherer, Benjamin A.
    Coogan, Christopher L.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 86 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [39] Malpractice claims in spine surgery in Germany: a 5-year analysis
    Ahmadi, Sebastian A.
    Sadat, Hosai
    Scheufler, Kai-Michael
    Steiger, Hans-Jakob
    Weber, Beate
    Beez, Thomas
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (07) : 1221 - 1231
  • [40] Malpractice claims against family physicians - Are the best doctors sued more?
    Ely, JW
    Dawson, JD
    Young, PR
    Doebbeling, BN
    Goerdt, CJ
    Elder, NC
    Olick, RS
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 48 (01) : 23 - 30