Decoding Academic Integrity Policies: A Corpus Linguistics Investigation of AI and Other Technological Threats

被引:35
作者
Perkins, Mike [1 ]
Roe, Jasper [2 ]
机构
[1] British Univ Vietnam, Hung Yen, Vietnam
[2] James Cook Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Academic integrity policies; Higher education institutions (HEIs); Artificial intelligence (AI) tools; ChatGPT; Technological explicitness; Policy reform; PLAGIARISM; COLLEGE;
D O I
10.1057/s41307-023-00323-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study presents a corpus analysis of academic integrity policies from Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) worldwide, exploring how they address the issues posed by technological threats, such as Automated Paraphrasing Tools and generative-artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT. The analysis of 142 policies conducted in November and December 2022, and May 2023 reveals a gap regarding the mention of AI and associated technologies in the available academic integrity policies. Despite the growing prevalence of these tools in the 6-month period since the release of ChatGPT, no HEIs had produced revised academic integrity policies. Content analysis of 53 guidance documents produced by HEIs suggests an overall positive focus of Gen AI tools, yet advises caution. This study suggests a modification to Bretag et al.'s (Int J Educ Integr 7, 2011) exemplary academic integrity model, introducing "Technological Explicitness" - emphasizing the need to include explicit guidelines about new technologies in academic integrity policies. These results underscore the urgent need for HEIs to revise their academic integrity policies, considering the evolving landscape of AI and its implications for academic integrity. This paper argues for a multifaceted approach to deal with the issues of integrating technology, education, policy reform, and assessment restructuring to navigate these challenges while upholding academic integrity.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 653
页数:21
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing [J].
Abd-Elaal, El-Sayed ;
Gamage, Sithara H. P. W. ;
Mills, Julie E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (05) :725-745
[2]  
Anderson R., 2007, Thematic content analysis (TCA): descriptive presentation of qualitative data
[3]   Academic integrity policies of Baltic state-financed universities in online public spaces [J].
Anohina-Naumeca, Alla ;
Tauginiene, Loreta ;
Odineca, Tatjana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2018, 14
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ACTA UNIV SIL MEND B, DOI DOI 10.11118/actaun201563010207
[5]  
Baker P., 2006, USING CORPORA DISCOU, DOI DOI 10.5040/9781350933996
[6]  
Baker Paul., 2004, Journal of English Linguistics, V32, P346, DOI [10.1177/0075424204269894, DOI 10.1177/0075424204269894]
[7]   A Strategy to Reduce Plagiarism in an Undergraduate Course [J].
Belter, Ronald W. ;
du Pre, Athena .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 36 (04) :257-261
[8]  
Biderman S., 2022, ARXIV, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2201.07406
[9]  
Bretag T, 2011, INT J EDUC INTEGR, V7, P3
[10]  
Brown S., 2005, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, V1, P81, DOI DOI 10.1187/CBE.11-03-0025