The impact of long-term care insurance system on family care: Evidence from China

被引:11
作者
Cao, Siyuan [1 ]
Xue, Huiyuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Govt, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Social Secur Studies, Sch Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
China; family care; formal care; long-term care insurance; time-varying difference-in-differences method; FORMAL CARE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; INFORMAL CARE; HEALTH-CARE; SUBSTITUTE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1002/hpm.3672
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
AimsThe inconsistent findings on the impact of the long-term care insurance (LTCI) system on family care require us to extend our study horizon to more countries with LTCI system designs or market practices. China has explored the LTCI system through pilot programs, which provide a quasi-natural experimental environment. This paper aims to examine how the LTCI system affects family care in China.MethodsWe primarily employ the time-varying difference-in-differences method to perform regression analyses based on the panel data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.ResultsWe discover a 7.2% rise in family care under the LTCI system. Specifically, the LTCI system is more likely to promote family care as the relatively primary care for disabled women, disabled people aged 60-74, and those who cannot fully take care of themselves. In addition, the formal care support policy of LTCI will crowd in both formal care and family care, and the crowding-in-effect on formal care may even obscure the crowding-in-effect on family care. The family care support policy of LTCI may encourage the policy-covered groups to take family care as their relatively primary care. It may also lengthen family care for those groups.ConclusionsThe LTCI system has a crowding-in effect on family care. It can increase family care through cash payments or linking formal and informal care resources by providing formal community and home care.
引用
收藏
页码:1435 / 1452
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Disability Research, P11
[2]   GOING FORMAL OR INFORMAL, WHO CARES? THE INFLUENCE OF PUBLIC LONG-TERM CARE INSURANCE [J].
Bakx, Pieter ;
De Meijer, Claudine ;
Schut, Frederik ;
Van Doorslaer, Eddy .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 24 (06) :631-643
[3]   A THEORY OF THE ALLOCATION OF TIME [J].
BECKER, GS .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1965, 75 (299) :493-517
[4]   Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe [J].
Bolin, K. ;
Lindgren, B. ;
Lundborg, P. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 17 (03) :393-409
[5]   Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? [J].
Bonsang, Eric .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 28 (01) :143-154
[6]   Informal and formal care: Substitutes or complements in care for people with dementia? Empirical evidence for 8 European countries [J].
Bremer, Patrick ;
Challis, David ;
Hallberg, Ingalill Rahm ;
Leino-Kilpi, Helena ;
Saks, Kai ;
Vellas, Bruno ;
Zwakhalen, Sandra M. G. ;
Sauerland, Dirk .
HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 121 (06) :613-622
[7]  
Cai W., 2021, Economic Dynamics, P48
[8]   Can family caregiving substitute for nursing home care? [J].
Charles, KK ;
Sevak, P .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 24 (06) :1174-1190
[9]   Towards a mixed economy of long-term care in Norway? [J].
Christensen, Karen .
CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2012, 32 (04) :577-596
[10]   Patterns of informal and formal caregiving among elders with private long-term care insurance [J].
Cohen, MA ;
Miller, J ;
Weinrobe, M .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 (02) :180-187